Virtual communities of practice in health and social care
Early outcomes from a developmental evaluation in Quebec
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 17554641 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ollivier Prigent (0009-0001-6880-2689, Université de Sherbrooke, corresponding author), Julie Lane (0000-0002-4289-1935, Université de Sherbrooke), Saliha Ziam (0000-0002-8892-9572, Université TÉLUQ) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 117 |
| Pages | 102778-102778 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evaluation and Program Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-7189 • E-ISSN: 1873-7870 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102778 |
| PMID | 41830857 |
| OpenAlex | W7134973059 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Knowledge transfer (KT) is essential for efficient practices among healthcare professionals and decision-makers in health and social services. To promote KT, communities of practice (CoPs) are being developed worldwide. In Quebec, a CoP has been established with a focus on implementation science and knowledge transfer practices (ISKT CoP) among members of the health and social services network from an organization linked to the Québec Ministry of health and social services. At the time of this study (in 2023), the ISKT CoP was in a developmental phase being less than a year old. Limited data are available to measure the effectiveness of CoPs, especially in a developmental phase. Hence, this study aimed to identify the success conditions and early benefits of the ISKT CoP using a Developmental Evaluation approach and an in-depth mixed-methods case study with data triangulation. Data were collected using two theoretical frameworks and a categorization. In total, sixty-five community of practice documents were analyzed, as well as the data from two interviews, the results of seven questionnaires and the discussions on the ISKT CoP forum. The main results highlight challenges facing the ISKT CoP with regard to member interactions, sharing of a common identity, and member engagement and participation. These challenges are mainly attributed to the time required to develop trusting relationships. Early positive outcomes were also observed, some members were able to expand their networks and explore collaborative opportunities, while most of the core competencies in KT were addressed by the ISKT CoP services
Best practice · Christian ministry · Community of practice · Data collection · Focus group · Health care · Knowledge sharing · Social network analysis · Community Health and Development · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Lost in knowledge translation
Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice
Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice1
Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
We Trust You! A Multilevel-Multireferent Model Based on Organizational Trust to Explain Performance
Managing the Inclusion Process in Collaborative Governance
The SPIRIT Action Framework
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |