Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 4614204 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jan Gerrit Voelkel (0000-0003-4275-9798, Stanford University, autor correspondente), James Chu, James C H Chu (0000-0002-1858-058X, Columbia University), Michael N Stagnaro (0000-0001-5512-7218, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Joseph S Mernyk (Stanford University), Chrystal Redekopp (0000-0003-0538-574X, Stanford University), Sophia L Pink (0000-0002-3546-2067, University of Pennsylvania), James N Druckman (0000-0002-1249-6790, Northwestern University), David G Rand (0000-0002-2821-468X), David Rand (0000-0001-8975-2783, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), R Willer (0000-0003-3404-6472, Stanford Medicine) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 55-64 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-10-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Nature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-022-01466-9 |
| PMID | 36316497 |
| OpenAlex | W4307715831 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 104 |
| Referências citadas | 45 |
Democracy · Depolarization · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Causal Evidence for the Role of Respect Norms in Promoting Tolerance
Lessons in division and unity
Democratic Accountability in East Asia
Cool Citizens? How Affectively Unpolarized Citizens View and Participate in Democracy
Affective, but not ideological, polarization increases tolerance for undemocratic behavior
Civic Solitude
Elite Interactions and Social Bonds
Correcting inaccurate metaperceptions reduces Americans’ support for partisan violence
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Measuring affective polarization
Mass Polarization Across Time and Space
Who Supports Democratic Backsliding? Evidence from Israel
From Data to Discovery
The impacts of ideological polarization among political elites on citizens’ attitudes toward opposing-party supporters via an affective channel
Polarization and the Psychology of Collectives
Blinded by out-group hatred
It’s Not Polarization; It’s the Radicalization of the Political Right
Supporting multi-perspectivity and depolarisation
Election salience revisited
Shackle or hammer? How polarisation influences political corruption
A registered report megastudy on the persuasiveness of the most-cited climate messages
Shifting Demographics, Shifting Perceptions
Examining psychological effects of demagogic discourse on perceived threat and political intolerance
Rating our certainty
One Size Might Not Fit All
Affective Polarization and Political Belief Systems
Influencia de las actitudes explícitas e implícitas en la selección de noticias y la orientación política
A Relative Deprivation-Based Theory of Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism
Correcting Misperceptions of Fundamental Differences Between U.S. Republicans and Democrats
Learning to Like the Enemy
Affective polarization and the support for populist and technocratic governance
Dodging the autocratic bullet
Examining real-world legitimization of cross-party violence through two explanatory frameworks
Divided opinion
The Impact of Social Norms on Cohesion and (De)Polarization
Mind the Gap! Linking Equality‐Based Respect Norms with General and Specific Tolerance
Do Affective Polarization and Populism Affect the Support for Holding Referendums
Examining the Territorial Dimension as a Source of Affective Polarization in the Spanish Multinational Democracy
Does Interaction With Out-Party Elites in a Classroom Setting Diminish Negative Partisanship
Education toward cosmopolitanism as a pathway to reducing polarisation
When polarization meets backsliding
Political tolerance and the golden rule
Contingent Confidence
Angry losers? The (null) effects of feeling electoral loss on anti-democratic attitudes
Beyond partisanship
Congenial messages from politicians reduce affective polarization among citizens
The disappointing (not hateful) divide
Reducing affective polarization does not affect false news sharing or truth discernment
In different worlds
Rehearsing civility
Priming common European and democratic values does not reduce affective polarization
Affect or Emotions? Disaggregating Affective Polarisation to Explain Support for Liberal Democracy in Belgium and the United Kingdom
The (alleged) consequences of affective polarization
Election outcomes and social trust in polarized times
Conforming to Deviate
Love Blinds? Winners, In-Party Favoritism, and Support for Violations of Democratic Norms
Partisan (In)Tolerance and Affective Polarization
Polarized Attitudes and Anti-Democratic Orientation
Deliberation and polarization
Social Capital in a Divided America
You’re Making Us Look Bad
Levels of Office and Voter Accountability for Democratic Norm Violations
Conditioning Public Opinion Perceptions by “Survey Methods 101”
The polarised electorate
Acquiescence Bias and Criterion Validity
Depolarization and its discontents
Affective polarization in Europe
How Violations of Electoral Integrity Undermine Partisan Attachments
How Bad Can It Get? Polarization and the Public Interest When It Matters
The Long Shadow of Partisan Hostility
It’s Not Just Trump
Two Tales of Polarization? How Affective and Ideological Polarization Influence Political Corruption—A Panel Analysis of 153 Countries Between 2000 and 2021
Elite Cooperation and Affective Polarization
Affective polarization and democratic erosion
Heroes and villains
Content that’s as good as contact? Vicarious intergroup contact and the promise of depolarization at scale
How to study democratic backsliding
The promise and peril of interpersonal political communication
Depolarizing within the Comfort of Your Party
Perspective Getting and Cross-Party Support for Electoral Fairness
E Pluribus Whom? The Limitations of American Identity in Reducing Racial Conflict
Need for Chaos and Dehumanization are Robustly Associated with Support for Partisan Violence, While Political Measures are Not
Does Priming Democratic Vulnerability Make Citizens Punish Undemocratic Behavior
When Push Comes to Shove
Do Fans Make Poor Referees? Exploring Citizens’ Reactions to Partisan Gamesmanship
Breaking free from linear assumptions
Partisan sorting, affective polarization, and democratic backsliding
A critique of the polarisation narrative
Strong Partisans, Conditional Democrats? Partisanship and Reactions to Electoral Outcomes in Argentina
Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries
What Can Depolarize the Polarizers? Affective Polarization for Party Activists Before and After Elections
Dynamic Democratic Backsliding
The Psychology of Left-Right Political Polarization; and an Experimental Intervention for Curbing Partisan Animosity and Support for Antidemocratic Violence
Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America
A New Measure of Affective Polarization
Interacting as equals reduces partisan polarization in Mexico
Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding
Defusing political animosity in the United States with a cooperative online quiz game
The poles in polarization
Affective Polarization and Consensus Building Among Parliamentary Elites
American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective
Why Washington Won't Work
Uncivil Agreement
Ethnic antagonism erodes Republicans’ commitment to democracy
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
The Jasp guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis
Reducing political polarization through narrative writing
Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization
Tribalism in America
Love thy (partisan) neighbor
Inclusion reduces political prejudice
Strategy News Is Good News
The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century
The Parties in Our Heads
Americans, Not Partisans
A Cross-Cutting Calm
How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms
Reducing Affective Polarization
Competing Motives in a Polarized Electorate
The Strengthening of Partisan Affect
Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact
The Correlates of Discord
Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
Partisan Dehumanization in American Politics
The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding
Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
Fear and Loathing across Party Lines
American Politics in Two Dimensions
The Economic Consequences of Partisanship in a Polarized Era
Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
The general fault in our fault lines
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
Partisan Affect and Elite Polarization
How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization
| Obras citantes distintas | 104 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 26 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Sim |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 97 |