River culture

How socio-ecological linkages to the rhythm of the waters develop, how they are lost, and how they can be regained

Bibliographic Data

ID4641916
AuthorsKarl M Wantzen (0000-0002-2192-1883, CNRS UMR CITERES University of Tours Tours France, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume190
Issue2
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeographical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/geoj.12476
OpenAlexW4292714958
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited103

The hydrological patterns of all natural water bodies pulse in variable rhythms of high and low water. The biodiversity of these ecosystems is driven by the changing nature of the environment, allowing different life strategies to coexist, e.g., by the fast reuse of nutrients when aquatic biota flourish in the recently wetted zones and vice versa. Much of the human culture in hydroscapes has developed as an adaptation to this rhythm, e.g., by using the flood-fertilised floodplains for agriculture or fisheries, or by seasonal migration into or out of the floodplain (transhumance). Technological advances have allowed humans to control, change, or even eliminate this natural water rhythm by building dams, dikes, and canals. Consequently, important ecosystem functions fail, often resulting in failure of human life-support systems but also in the failure and decline of cultural activities. I argue that the loss of socio-cultural connectivity to the rhythms of rivers and other hydrosystems occurs in four phases: (i) loss of direct relationships (e.g., uses of waterborne resources), (ii) loss of indirect relationships (cultural activities that are connected to theses uses), (iii) turning away from the river/hydrosystem (often caused by decreased water quality), and (iv) total oblivion (caused by removal or burial of the hydrosystem). Reintegrating more riverine rhythms into human life would not mean to step back in time but rather to find a combination of revised traditional ecological knowledge, learning from nature, changing values in the context of use of natural resources, and innovations. This paper draws on social-environmental aspects of the River Culture Concept - which attempts to reintegrate respect for the pulsing nature of hydrosystems into modern, sustainable management - and on diverse case studies. Examples are presented on how River Culture Concept approaches may contribute to revitalising socio-ecological linkages to the rhythm of the waters

Biology · Biota · Context (archaeology · Ecosystem · Floodplain · Geography · Natural (archaeology · Natural resource · Water quality · Ecology · Fish Ecology and Management Studies · Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access