Defusing political animosity in the United States with a cooperative online quiz game
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4654147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lucas Woodley (0009-0006-6821-7443, Harvard University Press, corresponding author), Evan Defilippis (0000-0001-9757-4374, Harvard University), Shankar Ravi (Harvard University), Jerome D Greene (0000-0002-3451-2966, Harvard University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1631-1644 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Nature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1038/s41562-025-02225-2 |
| PMID | 40461822 |
| OpenAlex | W4410974058 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Advertising · Business · Internet privacy · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Why Washington Won't Work
Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt
Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation
The Meaning of Translational Research and Why It Matters
Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts
The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation
Cognitive and Interpersonal Features of Intellectual Humility
How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self
The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization
Types of Contact
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
We Need to Talk
The contact hypothesis re-evaluated
Intergroup psychological interventions
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
Consuming Cross-Cutting Media Causes Learning and Moderates Attitudes
The Limits of Partisan Prejudice
Couples Therapy for a Divided America
Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not
Self-image resilience and dissonance
Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory
Effects of structured cooperative contact on changing negative attitudes toward stigmatized social groups
They see us as less than human
Compliance without pressure
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts
The general fault in our fault lines
Interventions to reduce partisan animosity
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
"Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on "America in One Room
Testing the Robustness of the Anes Feeling Thermometer Indicators of Affective Polarization
Voter Outreach Campaigns Can Reduce Affective Polarization among Implementing Political Activists
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |