Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Long-term risk of psychiatric disorder and psychotropic prescription after Sars-CoV-2 infection among UK general population

Bibliographic Data

ID4697969
AuthorsYunhe Wang (0000-0002-0923-1441, University of Oxford), Bomin Su (0000-0003-1814-024X, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Junqing Xie (0000-0002-0040-0042, Central South University, corresponding author), Clemente Garcia-Rizo, Clemente García‐Rizo (0000-0002-4855-1608, Instituto de Salud Carlos III), Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra (0000-0002-3950-6346, Erasmus MC)
Year2024
Volume8
Issue6
Pages1076-1087
Publication date2024-03-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNature Human Behaviour (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2397-3374 • E-ISSN: 2397-3374
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1038/s41562-024-01853-4
PMID38514769
OpenAlexW4393043598
LanguageEN
References cited34

Despite evidence indicating increased risk of psychiatric issues among COVID-19 survivors, questions persist about long-term mental health outcomes and the protective effect of vaccination. Using UK Biobank data, three cohorts were constructed: SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 26,101), contemporary control with no evidence of infection (n = 380,337) and historical control predating the pandemic (n = 390,621). Compared with contemporary controls, infected participants had higher subsequent risks of incident mental health at 1 year (hazard ratio (HR): 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.67; P = 1.70 × 10−24; difference in incidence rate: 27.36, 95% CI 21.16-34.10 per 1,000 person-years), including psychotic, mood, anxiety, alcohol use and sleep disorders, and prescriptions for antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers and opioids. Risks were higher for hospitalized individuals (2.17, 1.70-2.78; P = 5.80 × 10−10) than those not hospitalized (1.41, 1.30-1.53; P = 1.46 × 10−16), and were reduced in fully vaccinated people (0.97, 0.80-1.19; P = 0.799) compared with non-vaccinated or partially vaccinated individuals (1.64, 1.49-1.79; P = 4.95 × 10−26). Breakthrough infections showed similar risk of psychiatric diagnosis (0.91, 0.78-1.07; P = 0.278) but increased prescription risk (1.42, 1.00-2.02; P = 0.053) compared with uninfected controls. Early identification and treatment of psychiatric disorders in COVID-19 survivors, especially those severely affected or unvaccinated, should be a priority in the management of long COVID. With the accumulation of breakthrough infections in the post-pandemic era, the findings highlight the need for continued optimization of strategies to foster resilience and prevent escalation of subclinical mental health symptoms to severe disorders

Anxiety · Hazard ratio · Medical prescription · Mental health · Mood · Mood disorders · Population · Psychiatry · COVID-19 and Mental Health · COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 · Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • The impact of quarantine on mental health status among general population in China during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Yunhe Wang, Le Shi et al.•Molecular Psychiatry•2021

  • The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data

    Open Access•Clare Bycroft, Colin Freeman et al.•Nature•2018

  • Long covid—mechanisms, risk factors, and management

    Open Access•Harry Crook, Sanara Raza et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Bidirectional associations between Covid-19 and psychiatric disorder

    Open Access•Maxime Taquet, Sierra Luciano et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2021

  • Post-acute Covid-19 syndrome

    Open Access•Ani Nalbandian, Kartik Sehgal et al.•Nature Medicine•2021

  • How Covid-19 shaped mental health

    Open Access•Brenda W J H Penninx, Michael E Benros et al.•Nature Medicine•2022

  • Month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of Covid-19

    Open Access•Maxime Taquet, Jane Geddes et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2021

  • Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of Covid-19? Neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms

    Open Access•Emily A Troyer, Jordan N Kohn et al.•Brain, Behavior, and Immunity•2020

  • Principles of confounder selection

    Open Access•Tyler J Vanderweele•European Journal of Epidemiology•2019

  • Negative Controls

    Marc Lipsitch, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen et al.•Epidemiology•2010

  • Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services

    Open Access•Ray Moynihan, Sharon Sanders et al.•BMJ Open•2021

  • The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it

    Open Access•Samantha K Brooks, Rebecca K Webster et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement

    Open Access•Erik Von Elm, David G Altman et al.•The Lancet•2007

  • Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Open Access•Jianbo Lai, Simeng Ma et al.•JAMA Network Open•2020

  • A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies

    Open Access•Mary E Charlson, Peter Pompei et al.•Journal of Chronic Diseases•1987

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae