Interaction Between Participants in Focus Groups With Older Patients and General Practitioners
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4711035 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Janne Moen (Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, NEPI Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden, corresponding author), Karolina Antonov (Swedish Association of the Pharmaceutical Industry, Stockholm, Sweden), J Lars G Nilsson (NEPI Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden), Jenny Nilsson (0000-0001-5599-4127), Lena Ring (Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, Astrazeneca, HEOR, R&D, Södertälje, Sweden) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 607-616 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Health Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-7323 • E-ISSN: 1552-7557 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1049732309354097 |
| PMID | 19926797 |
| OpenAlex | W2114325609 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 31 |
Group interaction is put forward as the principal advantage for focus group research, although rarely reported on. The aim of the article is to contribute to the methodological knowledge regarding focus group research by providing an empirical example of the application of the Lehoux, Poland, and Daudelin template suggested for analysis of the interaction in focus groups. The data source was 18 focus groups' performance in Sweden: 12 with older patients and 6 with general practitioners (GPs). GPs found common ground in belonging to the same profession, whereas the older patients, instead of constituting a group in the word's real sense, started just sharing a common focus. We found the template easy to understand and use, except for identifying participants' explicit and implicit purposes for participating. Furthermore, adding an interaction analysis to the content analysis helped us appreciate and clarify the contexts from which these data were created
Focus group · Qualitative research · Sociology · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Issues in Poland · Gerontology
Using focus groups in naturally occurring settings
Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation
Mothers, milk and mourning
The challenges of conducting focus-group research among Asian older adults
Introducing Dyadic Interviews as a Method for Collecting Qualitative Data
Interviewing Separately or as Couples? Considerations of Authenticity of Method
Development of a Novel Coding Scheme to Explore Interactions in the Co-Production of Public Services with Priority Populations
Taking Humor Seriously
Qualitative research in health care
Qualitative research
Prenatal Care Use Among Women of Low Income
Successful Focus Groups
Qualitative Research in Health Care
Confronting the Ethics of Qualitative Research
“It’s No Skin off My Nose”
Using Written Vignettes in Focus Groups Among Older Adults to Discuss Oral Health as a Sensitive Topic
Who's talking
Using and analysing focus groups
Developing Focus Group Research
What About Focus Group Interaction Data
Getting the Focus and the Group
Power Relations in Qualitative Research
The Politics of Conducting Research on Depression in a Cross-Cultural Context
You Have to Make Something of All That Rubbish, Do You? An Empirical Investigation of the Social Process of Qualitative Research
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
"Focus group research and "the patient's view
Sex differences in self-disclosure
The Social Contexts of Focus Groups
Focus Groups
The methodology of Focus Groups
The patient's view
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,53 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2023 (13) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |