Refutable Anthropology and Falsified Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4745593 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Georges Guille-Escuret, Georges Guille‐escuret (United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 188 |
| Pages | 3-15 |
| Publication date | 1999-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Diogenes (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0392-1921 • E-ISSN: 1467-7695 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/039219219904718801 |
| OpenAlex | W2016700515 |
| Language | EN |
Is anthropology a science? To put the question today amounts to a reply in the negative. The representatives of the 'true' sciences are not alone in suggesting a conjunctural or crippling lacuna which would preclude membership by right of the prestigious world, which, however, the name 'humanistic sciences' seems to demand. We should remember that some years ago Claude Lévi-Strauss caused a shudder to run through his discipline by describing it as a 'flattering imposture'. Since then denigration has spread constantly, and it no longer consists of deploring a slowness, an equivocation or a handicap which we would have the hope of remedying: it is definitely a fatality which we are from now on invited to confirm
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |