A neural reward prediction error revealed by a meta-analysis of ERPs using great grand averages
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4837759 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas D Sambrook (0000-0001-5260-797X), Jeremy Goslin |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 141 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 213-235 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/bul0000006 |
| PMID | 25495239 |
| OpenAlex | W2012241920 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 3 |
Economic approaches to decision making assume that people attach values to prospective goods and act to maximize their obtained value. Neuroeconomics strives to observe these values directly in the brain. A widely used valuation term in formal learning and decision-making models is the reward prediction error: the value of an outcome relative to its expected value. An influential theory (Holroyd & Coles, 2002) claims that an electrophysiological component, feedback related negativity (FRN), codes a reward prediction error in the human brain. Such a component should be sensitive to both the prior likelihood of reward and its magnitude on receipt. A number of studies have found the FRN to be insensitive to reward magnitude, thus questioning the Holroyd and Coles account. However, because of marked inconsistencies in how the FRN is measured, a meaningful synthesis of this evidence is highly problematic. We conducted a meta-analysis of the FRN's response to both reward magnitude and likelihood using a novel method in which published effect sizes were disregarded in favor of direct measurement of the published waveforms themselves, with these waveforms then averaged to produce "great grand averages." Under this standardized measure, the meta-analysis revealed strong effects of magnitude and likelihood on the FRN, consistent with it encoding a reward prediction error. In addition, it revealed strong main effects of reward magnitude and likelihood across much of the waveform, indicating sensitivity to unsigned prediction errors or "salience." The great grand average technique is proposed as a general method for meta-analysis of event-related potential (ERP
Cognitive psychology · Econometrics · Electroencephalography · Mean squared prediction error · Mismatch negativity · Salience (neuroscience · Statistics · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function · Psychology
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research
Love at first glance
Interactions between faces and visual context in emotion perception
Hope for the best when the result is uncertain
Interpersonal distance modulates outcome evaluation in the social comparison of ability
Rational choices elicit stronger sense of agency in brain and behavior
Opportunity (in)equity affects outcome evaluation at an early cognitive stage
反馈评估的局部背景依赖效应
The effect of working memory load on feedback processing
Repetition suppression between monetary loss and social pain
Altered Neural Processing of Reward and Punishment in Women With Methamphetamine Use Disorder
Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation
Devaluation insensitivity of event related potentials associated with food cues
Neurocognitive reward processes measured via event-related potentials are associated with binge-eating disorder diagnosis and ecologically-assessed behavior
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |