The Dialect of the Tribe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4846289 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Harry Mathews (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 52 |
| Publication date | 1980-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SubStance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0049-2426 • E-ISSN: 1527-2095 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3683878 |
| OpenAlex | W2321216261 |
| Language | EN |
Thank you for the letter suggesting I contribute to the Festschrift in your honor. I have never doubted that in translating your work I have been of service to our two cultures, but I am flattered to think that my general views on translation may be worth a hearing. I shall be happy to contribute to the homage you are deservedly to receive, not only for the privilege of collaborating in so distinguished an enterprise, but because I truly feel that the subject you have assigned me is a vital one. The longer I live-the longer I write-the stronger becomes my conviction that translation is the paradigm, the exemplar of all writing. To put it another way: it is translation that demonstrates most vividly the yearning for transformation that underlies every act involving speech, that supremely human gift. Of course I am not saying that translation-at least not as I practice it-takes precedence over other modes of writing. On the contrary: it is its modesty that makes it so useful. But while it differs enormously in substance from true writing (like your own), the difference is one of degree. One might then say that insofar as true writing is a kind of translation, the text from which it works is an infinitely arduous one: nothing less than the universe itself. By coincidence-only minds poorer than ours would call it accident-I was, as you were writing your letter, engaged in radically extending my knowledge of translation, in a way as appropriate as it was unforeseen. I had returned for ten days to Fitchwinder University in order to continue my research on the Bactrian controversy. Our old friend Ms. Maxine Moon is still librarian there; and it was she who brought to my attention the unexpected text that was to occupy me during the rest of my stay. This text was not in Bactrian, it was not about Bactria-in fact it put the Bactrians quite out of my head. It was in, of all things, Pagolak, the speech of a small hill tribe in northern New Guinea; and it had been transcribed for an article in an Australian anthropological journal by one Ernest Botherby (bless him!). It was entitled-by Dr. Botherby perhaps-Kalo Gap Pagolak, meaning magic transformation of Pagolak. Ms. Moon, correctly, thought it would interest me. The text, she said, was an account of a method used by the Pagolakspeaking tribe to translate their tongue into the dialects of their neighbors. What was remarkable about this method was that while it produced translations that foreign listeners could understand and accept, it also concealed from them the original meaning of every statement made. You will understand that once I had heard this much, it was impossible not to want to learn more. To translate successfully and not reveal one's meaning-what could be
Geography · Linguistics · Sociology · Tribe · Anthropology · Australian Indigenous Culture and History · History · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|