Distinctively political normativity in political theory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4870593 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eva Erman (0000-0001-7096-9157, Stockholm University, corresponding author), Naomi Moller (0000-0003-2645-8995, Stockholm University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12835 |
| OpenAlex | W4224279687 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 36 |
Recent years' literature on distinctively political normativity raises methodological and meta-theoretical concerns of importance for political theory. The aim of this article is to identify and critically examine the main positions in this debate as well as to analyze problems and promising ways forward. In brief, we argue that the predominant "non-moral view" of distinctively political normativity (i.e., the view that political normativity is independent of moral normativity), is problematic in all its three versions. Further, we suggest that a reasonable approach to political normativity should adopt a "moral view" (i.e., the view that political normativity is not independent of moral normativity) and investigate two such approaches: the so-called "filter approach" and the "role approach." Although still much in need of further development in political theory, both of them bear promise as accounts which preserve the distinctness of the political domain while acknowledging its status as a moral kind
Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Influence · War, Ethics, and Justification
The Appropriateness of Political Emotions
Metaethics as Dead Politics? On Political Normativity and Justification
Political Violence
Norms for political cynics. A metatheoretical exploration of the relation between power and normativity in politics
The Priority Question and Its Solutions
On Being a Realist about Migration
The Foundation of Liberty for the Normativity in Bernard Williams’s Realist Theory of Legitimacy
What is distinctive of political normativity? From domain view to role view
The Importance and Limitation of Epistemic Norms in Political Theory
Ethics
The Myth of Morality
Confusion of Tongues
Why Political Realists Should Not Be Afraid of Moral Values
Paternalism
What Is a Political Value? Political Philosophy and Fidelity to Reality
‘Recover it From the Facts as We Know Them’
Political Norms and Moral Values
Virtue and Reason
Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity?
Distinctively Political Normativity in Political Realism
Realism and Political Normativity
The Sources of Political Normativity
How radical is radical realism
Politics and the Imagination
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy
Philosophy and Real Politics
The radical realist critique of Rawls
Political realism as ideology critique
Consensus, compromise, justice and legitimacy
Ethics, morality and the case for realist political theory
What is distinctive of political normativity? From domain view to role view
Being realistic and demanding the impossible
Political Legitimacy for Our World
Property, Legitimacy, Ideology
Legitimacy in Realist Thought
On What a Distinctively Political Normativity Is
Playing Kant at the Court of King Arthur
Political normativity and the functional autonomy of politics
With radicals like these, who needs conservatives? Doom, gloom, and realism in political theory
How to do realistic political theory (and why you might want to)
Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World
Realism in Normative Political Theory
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |