Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Importance and Limitation of Epistemic Norms in Political Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID6008909
AuthorsEva Erman (0000-0001-7096-9157), Niklas Möller
Year2025
Volume23
Issue1
Pages352-371
Publication date2025-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Studies Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1478-9299 • E-ISSN: 1478-9302
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/14789299241266196
OpenAlexW4401121529
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited43

One recent debate in political theory centers on the question of whether there is a distinctively political normativity. According to an influential view, there is a distinctive set of norms that applies specifically to political actions and decisions, which are not grounded in moral normativity. On one version of this non-moral view, political theory is grounded in epistemic normativity (and thus epistemic norms). Theorists identifying as “radical realists” insist that political theorists do not need any moral normativity (and thus moral norms), because epistemic normativity may provide action-guidance for political theory. In this article, we take our point of departure in a critical analysis of this epistemic version of the non-moral view, with the overall aim of analyzing the importance and limitation of epistemic norms in political theory. We argue that epistemic norms are necessary—since a political theory should not rely on empirical falsities—but not sufficient for a successful account in the political domain. Two claims are made: moral norms are essential in the process of political theorizing, both in the form of pre-epistemic norms and in the form of post-epistemic norms. More specifically, we contend, first, that we need moral norms to identify and justify which practices to study when conducting political theorizing, and second, that we need moral norms to tell us how to act in light of our investigation of warranted and unwarranted beliefs

Epistemology · Moral disengagement · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • From margins to mastery

    Open Access•Saroj Kumar Aryal, Manish Jung Pulami•SN Social Sciences•2025

  • Is political realism normatively implausible? Normative constraints, actual constraints, and the goals of normative political theory

    Ben Cro, BEN CROSS•Inquiry•2025

  • Ideology and suffering

    Open Access•Amadeus Ulrich•European Journal of Political…•2025

  • Empirical Political Theory

    Open Access•Nahshon Pérez•Political Studies Review•2025

  • The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2016

  • Rescuing Justice and Equality

    G A Cohen•Rescuing Justice and Equality•2008

  • Rationality Through Reasoning

    Open Access•Ernest Sosa, John Broome•Rationality Through Reasoning•2013

  • Political Norms and Moral Values

    Robert Jubb, Enzo Rossi et al.•Journal of Philosophical Research•2015

  • Must Realists Be Pessimists About Democracy? Responding to Epistemic and Oligarchic Challenges

    Open Access•Gordon Arlen, Enzo Rossi•Moral Philosophy and Politics•2021

  • Distinctively Political Normativity in Political Realism

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller et al.•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

  • The Sources of Political Normativity

    Open Access•Carlo Burelli, Chiara Destri•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2022

  • How radical is radical realism

    Open Access•Ben Cro•European Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Realism and metanormativity

    Open Access•Adrian Kreutz•Inquiry•2023

  • Financial Power and Democratic Legitimacy

    Janosch Prinz, Enzo Rossi•Social Theory and Practice•2022

  • Political Realism and Epistemic Constraints

    Ugur Aytac•Social Theory and Practice•2022

  • Ideal Theory and Action-Guidance

    Naima Chahboun•Social Theory and Practice•2019

  • Politics and the Imagination

    Open Access•Raymond Geuss•Politics and the Imagination•2010

  • Philosophy and Real Politics

    Raymond Geuss•Philosophy and Real Politics•2008

  • Practice-dependence and epistemic uncertainty

    Eva Erman, Naomi Moller•Journal of Global Ethics•2017

  • The radical realist critique of Rawls

    Paul Raekstad•Critical Review of International…•2021

  • Political realism as ideology critique

    Open Access•Janosch Prinz, Enzo Rossi•Critical Review of International…•2017

  • Consensus, compromise, justice and legitimacy

    Enzo Rossi•Critical Review of International…•2013

  • How practices do not matter

    Eva Erman, Naomi Moller•Critical Review of International…•2017

  • Political realism, legitimacy, and a place for external critique

    Open Access•Ilaria Cozzaglio•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2021

  • Raymond Geuss’ radicalization of realism in political theory

    Open Access•Janosch Prinz•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2016

  • What is distinctive of political normativity? From domain view to role view

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller et al.•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2023

  • What distinguishes the practice-dependent approach to justice

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller et al.•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2016

  • Truth and Truthfulness

    Open Access•Bernard Williams•Truth and Truthfulness•2010

  • Being realistic and demanding the impossible

    Open Access•Enzo Rossi•Constellations•2019

  • The Place of Plural Voting in Mill's Conception of Representative Government

    Open Access•Dale E Miller•The Review of Politics•2015

  • Principles as Guides

    Richard North, R Alan North•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Property, Legitimacy, Ideology

    Enzo Rossi, Carlo Argenton•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Fact-Centric Political Theory, Three Ways

    Open Access•Enzo Rossi•Political Studies Review•2023

  • Getting Realistic About Action-Guidance

    Open Access•Ben Cro•Political Studies Review•2024

  • Facts and Principles

    Open Access•G A Cohen, Glenn Cohen•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2003

  • Two dogmas of liberalism

    Open Access•Glen Newey•European Journal of Political…•2010

  • Political normativity and the functional autonomy of politics

    Open Access•Carlo Burelli•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Realism, liberal moralism and a political theory of modus vivendi

    Open Access•John Horton•European Journal of Political…•2010

  • Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller et al.•British Journal of Political…•2015

  • Resisting Reality

    Sally Haslanger, Sally Anne Haslanger•Resisting reality•2012

  • Distinctively political normativity in political theory

    Open Access•Eva Erman, Naomi Moller•Philosophy Compass•2022

  • Ideology Critique without Morality

    Open Access•Ugur Aytac, Enzo Rossi•American Political Science Review•2023

Unique citing works4
Citations per year4
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae