Specimen Poetics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4889101 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Porter (0000-0003-0275-7472, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 139 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 60-94 |
| Publication date | 2017-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Representations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0734-6018 • E-ISSN: 1533-855X |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/rep.2017.139.1.60 |
| OpenAlex | W2606011428 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
This essay argues that the modern literary anthology-and specifically its aspiration to delimit both aesthetic merit and historical representativeness-emerged as a response to changes in eighteenth-century botanical collecting, description, and illustration. A dramatic upsurge in botanical metaphors for poetic collections around 1800 was triggered by shifts in the geographies, aims, and representational practices of botany in the previous century. Yoking Linnaean taxonomy and Buffonian vitalism to Hogarth's line of beauty, late eighteenth-century botanical illustrations imbued plucked, pressed specimens with a new vitality. Erasmus Darwin's Botanic Garden (1789, 1791) translated the aesthetic reanimations of visual art into a collection of poetic specimens, spurring compilations that promote a vitalist standard of literary value. By rejecting aesthetic reanimation as the figurative ground for poetic collecting, Charlotte Smith and Robert Southey forward an alternative historical model of literary merit, one grounded in the succession and continuity of representative literary types. These competing metrics for selection and valuation underwrite the anthology as we know it today
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Beauty · Erasmus · Literature · Painting · Poetics · Poetry · Vitalism · Animal and Plant Science Education · Historical and Literary Studies · History
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |