Designerly mapping practices at the crossroads of cartography and urbanism

A processual account of three re-cartographies of southwest Flanders

Bibliographic Data

ID4933166
AuthorsBieke Cattoor (KU Leuven, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume47
Issue6
Pages1283-1297
Publication date2015-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0308518x15594902
OpenAlexW2286275705
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited14

Re-cartography is a designerly mapping practice that aims to challenge dominant spatial epistemologies while expanding the scope of our spatial imagination. Particularly relevant to contemporary complex spatial problematics, and emerging within the context of urbanism, re-cartography is an intrinsically projective practice that is orientated towards a (re)shaping of the environment. This paper presents a short processual account of three re-cartographies of southwest Flanders. These three cases represent an ongoing attempt to reimagine the region in contemporary terms. Taken together, they remap the area in terms of multiplicity, heterogeneity, and hybridity, and reimagine the territory as a dynamic layering of different historical processes and relationships. To this end, the maps rethink common cartographic strategies and procedures-such as element selection, categorization, and symbolization, periodization, layering, scaling, and atlas composition-and recombine them in novel ways. They also demonstrate the relevance of re-cartography as an urban design tool: as a practice with the capacity to incorporate various perspectives, both context and potential, re-cartography is able to suggest a universe of latent possiblities within a given site. Of interest to cartographic theory is the observation that re-cartography treats both the territory and the map as ongoing processes. In this sense, the cases reflect the almost pragmatic coexistence of two seemingly contradictory cartographic ontologies at the heart of urbanism: the consideration of the map as a (partial) workable mirror and a concomitant engagement with the postrepresentational quality of the map as a project

Archaeology · Cartographic generalization · Cartography · Epistemology · Geography · Political science · Urbanism · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Philosophy · Architecture

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub