Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Generality above Abstraction

The General Expressed in Terms of the Paradigmatic in Mathematics in Ancient China

Bibliographic Data

ID4935493
AuthorsKarine Chemla (0000-0002-2625-5736, Université Paris Cité, corresponding author)
Year2003
Volume16
Issue3
Pages413-458
Publication date2003-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience in Context (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0269889703000905
OpenAlexW2114226318
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited14

ArgumentAbstraction is commonly valued as being essential to mathematics or even consubstantial with it. In relation to this belief, mathematical texts from Antiquity – be they from Babylon, Egypt, or China –, which are composed of seemingly concrete problems and algorithms solving them, have been considered to be practice-oriented and deprived of theory. This paper offers an alternative view on both issues. Relying on evidence given by third-century commentaries on The Nine Chapters on Mathematical Procedures, a Chinese treatise composed around the beginning of the Common Era,this paper argues that, in the scholarly mathematical tradition of ancient China, generality was more valued than abstraction. In this respect, problems must be interpreted as paradigms, in the sense grammarians use the term. One of the goals of theoretical endeavor was to exhibit the most general operations possible, and this purpose can be read in quite a few specific features of mathematical practice and concepts. Moreover, it is shown that abstraction is not absent from The Nine Chapters, but that it entertains with generality a relationship that requires analysis and can by no means be taken for granted. These ancient sources hence constitute an invitation to develop a critical approach toward the relation of mathematics to abstraction and generality taken separately, as well as the relation of these two values with each other

Abstraction · China · Epistemology · Exposition (narrative) · Extension (predicate logic) · Generality · Literature · Mathematical practice · Programming language · Relation (database) · Term (time) · Chinese history and philosophy · Computer Science · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Generality and iteration

    Open Access•Taro Tokutake•Historia Mathematica•2026

  • Un Análisis Comparativo Del Uso De Diagramas en Dos Prácticas Matemáticas De La Antigüedad

    Open Access•MANUEL J GARCÍA-PÉREZ, Tamires Dal Magro•Critica•2019

  • Textual materiality and abstraction in mathematics

    Open Access•Anna Kiel Steensen, Mikkel Willum Johansen et al.•Science in Context•2022

  • How Do Excavated Manuscripts and Transmitted Canons and Commentaries Shed Light on Each Other? An Outlook From Mathematics

    Open Access•Karine Chemla•Early China•2022

  • Mathematical symbols as epistemic actions

    Open Access•Helen De Cruz, Johan De Smedt•Synthese•2013

  • Berzelian formulas as generative paper tools

    Open Access•Emily R Grosholz•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2005

  • Analogical Reasoning in Ancient China

    Alexei Volkov, Alexeï K Volkov•Extrême-Orient Extrême-Occident•1992

  • Similarities between Chinese and Arabic Mathematical Writings

    Open Access•Karine Chemla•Arabic Sciences and Philosophy•1994

  • On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics

    Open Access•Sabetai Unguru•Boston studies in the philosophy…•2004

  • What is at Stake in Mathematical Proofs from Third-Century China

    Open Access•Karine Chemla•Science in Context•1997

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2005 - 2026 (22)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae