How to Mend a Fragmented City
A Critique of 'Infrastructural Solidarity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4938543 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura Cesafsky (Department of Geography, Environment and Society, University of Minnesota 414 Social Sciences, 267 19th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 145-161 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-1317 • E-ISSN: 1468-2427 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1468-2427.12447 |
| OpenAlex | W2601115965 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 57 |
Cities in Latin America in particular have been investing in new transportation networks such as bicycle systems, metros and bus rapid transit (BRT) technologies in recent years. These infrastructures are promoted as cures for trenchant social and spatial divisions as much as for traffic gridlock and vehicular pollution. This article unpacks the theory that infrastructures might mend cities that have been fragmented into disparate parts by uneven capitalist development. I argue that this 'infrastructural solidarity' thesis relies on a troubled imagination-shared across urban design and strands of urban theory-that infrastructures are static, formal arrangements that concretize relations and enforce social cohesion or fragmentation. This article draws on qualitative research on the TransMilenio BRT system in Bogotá, Colombia, as well as on the work of Bruno Latour, suggesting that the political life of infrastructure is better revealed when such systems are understood as dense knots of shifting relations with complex temporalities. Arguments for the value of this type of actor-network theory (ANT) reading often skew towards the esoteric, but the TransMilenio case shows how sorting through infrastructural ontologies actually matters in terms of how urbanists-academic and practicing-conceive of and work towards just and functional cities
Actor–network theory · Bus rapid transit · Geography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public transport · Social science · Sociology · Solidarity · Technocracy · Temporalities · Urban theory · Urbanism · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure
Re‐arranging the urban
The Modern Infrastructure Landscape and the Legacy of Slavery
Democracy on the move? Bogotá’s urban transport strategies and the access to the city
Negotiating networked infrastructural inequalities
Situating Equitable Infrastructure
To complete modernity or to embrace heterogeneity? From historical inequality towards an uncertain future for water infrastructure in Mexico City
The sub/urban fix
Infrastructural excess
New Ward for a New Johannesburg? Reformatting Belonging and Boundaries in the City’s South
Social infrastructure and public life – notes on Finsbury Park, London
Infrastructural Heterogeneity
Transferring transport policy problems
Analyzing transport politics through “critical moments”
Social infrastructure and the public life of cities
San Francisco Through Bogotá's Eyes
Corruption as Infrastructure
Retrofit
When top-down infrastructures fail
Shaping technology/building society
Disrupted Cities
Social Power and the Urbanization of Water
The Politics of the Encounter
Fractured cities
Splintering Urbanism
The Whale and the Reactor
Roles and Challenges of Urban Design
Bogotá and Medellín
Gated communities in Latin American megacities
Reinventing Planning
The Agency of Assemblages and the North American Blackout
City Life from Jakarta to Dakar
Cementing Relations
Reassembling the Social
Mobility innovation at the urban margins
Assemblage and critical urbanism
Telescopic urbanism and the poor
Small technologies, big change
Planning, Anti-planning and the Infrastructure Crisis Facing Metropolitan Lagos
Affect and biopower
Placing splintering urbanism
Tool-power
We Have Never Been Modern
Urban Informality
The Good City
On assemblages and geography
STS and the City
Technologies of Government
Political Infrastructures
Privatizing water
Forging Glocal Governance? Urban Infrastructures as Networked Financial Products
Beautifying the Slum
Landscapes of Disaster
Technology is Society Made Durable
The Right to the City
Material Politics
Citizenship Prepaid
Infrastructure turned suprastructure
Lively Infrastructure
The Urban Problematic
The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation
Out of Order
Morality and Technology
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
Pressure
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |