Social infrastructure and public life – notes on Finsbury Park, London

Bibliographic Data

ID8073582
AuthorsJack Layton (0000-0002-9673-6797, Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK), Alan Latham (0000-0002-6826-8906, Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume43
Issue5
Pages755-776
Publication date2021-06-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0272-3638 • E-ISSN: 1938-2847
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02723638.2021.1934631
OpenAlexW3171542209
LanguageEN
Citations received40
References cited84

Cities need social infrastructure, places that support social connection in neighborhoods and across communities. In the face of austerity in many places, the provision of such infrastructures are under threat. To protect such infrastructures, it is important to have robust arguments for their provision, maintenance, and protection. Through a case study of a dispute about the appropriate use and provisioning of an everyday park located in London, UK, this article examines what social infrastructure is and why it matters. The dispute has brought to the surface a number of critical questions about how to fund and provide collective, public social life. It has also raised questions about what types of social and collective life should be valued. To examine the dispute a sixfold typology is developed to explore the different registers of sociality afforded by social infrastructure: co-presence, sociability and friendship, care and kinship, kinesthetic practices, and civic engagement

Austerity · Kinship · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociality · Sociology · Typology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure · Law

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access