Social Media, Collaboration, and Scientific Organizations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4940256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dhiraj Murthy (0000-0001-9734-1124, Goldsmiths College, University of London, UK), Jeremiah P Lewis (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME, USA) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 149-171 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764214540504 |
| OpenAlex | W2042380919 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 34 |
The use of social media by collaborative organizations has been studied in a variety of contexts, including virtual teams, enterprise organizations, and social movements. However, social media are not often examined within the context of scientific organizations. This article explores how an organization of 122 life scientists and science-related professionals-anonymized as Science City Network (SciCity)-combine monthly symposia with social media, including Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. Using an online survey, we found that younger SciCity members are more interested in using social media to support a collaborative community, whereas older members are more interested in social applications. Social media use was not found to significantly differ by gender. Using social network analysis, we found several individuals who act as hubs of information who keep the SciCity Twitter network alive. However, the hierarchical structure of the network reveals that it is better suited for information dissemination than innovation and collaboration. Our examination of this scientific organization ultimately offers insight into how a coalition of multiple social media technologies is used differentially by organizational members and that there is ultimately no general consensus of the utility of social media to scientific collaboration. This finding tempers some claims of the utility of social media for scientific collaboration
Context (archaeology) · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Social media · Social network (sociolinguistics) · Social network analysis · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Adopción de redes sociales por revistas científicas de ciencias sociales
Communication systems for scientific collaboration and mobility. Evidence from Spain
Empowering EFL teachers through social media
Understanding and measuring mobile Facebook use
The science of team science (SciTS)
Building community online and on the trail
The Use of Social Media to Foster Trust, Mentorship, and Collaboration in Scientific Organizations
Social Network Analysis
When Atoms Meet Bits
Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Interaction Ritual
How Offline Gatherings Affect Online Communities
Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere
Online and offline social networks
Who interacts on the Web
From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation
Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site
The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities
Scaling
Mentoring Early-Career Scientists for HIV Research Careers
Youth and scientific innovation
Snowball Sampling
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,58 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2026 (13) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |