An assessment-based approach to understanding intersectional privilege

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4944449
AutoresSheerah Neal Keith (0000-0002-2682-242X, Department of Leadership and Counselor Education The University of Mississippi University Mississippi USA, autor correspondente), David P Boyd (0000-0002-0104-0050, Department of Special Education, Rehabilitation, and Counseling Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA), Erica Montgomery (0000-0002-9435-3979, Department of Leadership and Counselor Education The University of Mississippi University Mississippi USA), Monica L Coleman (0000-0002-0513-0221, Department of Leadership and Counselor Education The University of Mississippi University Mississippi USA)
Ano2024
Volume63
Fascículo1
Páginas69-81
Data de publicação2024-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCounselor Education and Supervision (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0011-0035 • E-ISSN: 1556-6978
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ceas.12291
OpenAlexW4390048879
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas27

Awareness of intersectional privilege is a theme woven throughout the Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies (MSJCC). However, a paucity of resources exists to guide counselor educators and supervisors in helping counselors-in-training (CITs) examine personal positions of privilege embedded within the MSJCC framework. The Intersectional Privilege Screening Inventory (IPSI) is among the first instruments yielding psychometrically valid scores to assess intersectional privilege as a training tool for CITs. We urge counselor educators and supervisors to employ the IPSI to facilitate CIT growth and development in multicultural and social justice counseling. A brief review of the literature on intersectionality, privilege, and intersectional privilege is presented as a foundational context for the broader discussion of the IPSI. We then describe a conceptual approach for using the IPSI in CIT training and development followed by case examples highlighting the IPSI's utility. We conclude with implications for counselor education and supervision

Context (archaeology) · Counselor education · Criminology · Higher education · Intersectionality · Multiculturalism · Pedagogy · Privilege (computing) · Social justice · Sociology · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Gender Studies · Mentoring and Academic Development · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications