Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

New spaces for the local welfare state? The case of General Relief in Los Angeles County

Bibliographic Data

ID4957586
AuthorsGeoffrey Deverteuil (0000-0003-3036-9303), Woobae Lee, Jennifer Wolch (0000-0003-4252-7495)
Year2002
Volume3
Issue3
Pages229-246
Publication date2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial & Cultural Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1464-9365 • E-ISSN: 1470-1197
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1464936022000003514
OpenAlexW2059403916
LanguageEN
Citations received27
References cited15

The current 'hollowing out' and devolution of the national welfare state produces new spaces for the local welfare state, theoretically allowing more leeway to dismantle, privatize, further devolve, or even experiment with new local bureaucratic structures. At the same time, national devolution places greater burdens on local resources. Over the past twenty years, a series of theoretical frameworks have been proposed to understand local welfare strategies under these concomitant opportunities and pressures, including street-level bureaucracy, shadow and workfare states. Despite the usefulness of these frameworks, they have rarely been applied to the long-term evolution of specific local programmes. A particularly glaring omission is General Assistance (GA), which constitutes a major component of many local welfare states. To address this gap, we examine the past twenty years of General Relief (GR) policies in Los Angeles County. GR is a locally funded mandatory programme that provides aid of last resort for indigent individuals. In the face of exploding demand and rising expenditures, and unable to directly eliminate the programme, the County employed a variety of strategies designed to ration services and depress demand. In the 1980s, these strategies were articulated through low-level and indirect bureaucratic disentitlements, including quality control and spatial consolidation. By the 1990s, the County took a more direct route, cutting benefits in 1993 and imposing time-limits and workfare in 1997. Despite severe constraints, the evolution of GR strategies in Los Angeles County does suggest the emergence of genuinely new regulatory spaces, including a diminution of outlays, counter-balanced by the increasing micro-management of clients and the materialization of a workfare and even shadow state. At present, the local welfare state in Los Angeles County combines the convolution of Franz Kafka with the misery of Charles Dickens. While our review goes some way in redressing the critical lack of local case studies, there remains a need to investigate instances of new local regulatory spaces, to understand in depth the engagement of various strategies, mechanisms and even resistance. Le deacutemantegravelement courant de l'Etat-providence agrave l'eacutechelle nationale cegravede la place agrave de nouveaux services sociaux agrave l'eacutechelle locale, ouvrant en theacuteorie la voie agrave la privatisation, la reacuteorganisation et l'expeacutermentation de nouvelles structures bureaucratiques. Toutefois, le deacutemantegravelement du systegraveme national impute un plus grand fardeau aux ressources locales. Au cours des vingt derniegraveres anneacutees, plusieurs cadres theacuteoriques ont eacuteteacute proposeacutes afin de comprendre les strateacutegies locales de distribution de services sociaux face agrave ces pressions et opportuniteacutes, incluant les concepts de bureaucracie de rue et 'workfare state.' Malgreacute que ces cadres d'analyse soient utiles, ils ont rarement servi agrave eacutetudier l'eacutevolution agrave long terme de programmes locaux speacutecifiques. Ce manque est particuliegraverement flagrant en ce qui a trait agrave l'Assistance Geacuteneacuterale ('General Assistance', GA) qui constitue un eacuteleacutement majeur de beaucoup de services sociaux locaux. Afin de corriger cette lacune, nous analysons les vingt derniegraveres anneacutees de politiques eacuteconomiques et sociales relieacutees au Secours Geacuteneacuteral ('General Relief', GR) dans le comteacute de Los Angeles. GR est un programme obligatoire distribuant une aide de dernier recours aux personnes sans resource. Face agrave une demande et des coucircts grandissants et pourtant incapable d'eacuteliminer directement le programme, le comteacute mit en pratique une seacuterie de tactiques dans le but de rationner les services et faire baisser la demande. Dans les anneacutees 1980, ces tactiques furent deacuteployeacutees par le biais de droits bureaucratiques, incluant controcircle de la qualiteacute et consolidation spatiale. Degraves les anneacutees 1990 le comteacute adopta des moyens plus directs, coupant les allocations en 1993 et imposant des eacutecheacuteances et programmes de support agrave l'emploi (workfare) en 1997. Malgreacute ces seacutevegraveres contraintes, l'eacutevolution des strateacutegies de secours geacuteneacuteral dans le comteacute de Los Angeles indique l'eacutemergence de nouveaux espaces reacutegulatoires - incluant la diminution des deacutepenses - dont le contrepoids est la preacutesence grandissante de 'micro-geacuterance' des clients et la mateacuterialisation de l'aide agrave l'emploi et de l'ombre eacutetatique. Au moment preacutesent, l'Etat-providence local dans le comteacute de Los Angeles est agrave mi-chemin entre les circonvolutions de Franz Kafka et la misegravere de Charles Dickens. Si notre survol cherche agrave corriger le manque critique d'eacutetudes locales, le besoin demeure preacutesent d'investiguer les exemples de nouveaux espaces reacutegulatoires afin de comprendre agrave fond le chevauchement des diffeacuterentes strateacutegies, meacutecanismes et reacutesistances. La 'excavacioacuten' y la delegacioacuten actuales del estado de bienestar nacional producen nuevos espacios para el estado de bienestar local, lo cual, en teoriacutea, permite el desmontaje, la privatizacioacuten y maacutes delegacioacuten de la burocracia local o hasta la oportunidad de experimentar con nuevas estructuras de burocracia local. Al mismo tiempo, delegacioacuten nacional consume limitados recursos existentes en el aacutembito local. En los uacuteltimos veinte antildeos han sido propuestos una serie de marcos teoreacuteticos para mejor entender las estrateacutegicas de bienestar local implementadas bajo estas oportunidades y presiones concomitantes, incluso la burocracia al nivel de la calle, y los 'workfare states'. A pesar de la utilidad de estos marcos, raras veces han sido aplicados a la evolucioacuten a largo plazo de especiacuteficas programas locales. Una omisioacuten destacable es General Assistance (Asistencia General), lo cual constituye un componente importante de muchos estados de bienestar locales. Con el fin de cerrar esta brecha, examinamos las poliacuteticas de General Relief (GR) (Ayuda General) de los uacuteltimos veinte antildeos en Los Angeles County. GR es un programa mandatario, elaborado con fondos locales y que proporciona ayuda en uacuteltimo caso a individuos indigentes. En vista de la aumentando demanda y los gastos incrementados, y sin la autoridad de eliminar el programa de forma directa, el County empleoacute varias estrateacutegicas con el fin de racionar sus servicios y hacer bajar la demanda. En los antildeos 80, estas estrateacutegicas fueron articuladas por desautorizaciones burocraacuteticas, a bajo nivel e indirectas, y que incluiacutean control de calidad y consolidacioacuten espacial. En los antildeos 90, el County tomoacute una ruta maacutes directa; redujo subsidios en 1993 e impuso liacutemites-temporales y 'workfare' en 1997. A pesar de las severas restricciones, la evolucioacuten de las estrateacutegicas de GR en Los Angeles County sugiere la aparicioacuten de espacios reguladores verdaderamente nuevos, incluso una disminucioacuten de desembolsos, contrapesada con un aumento en el micro-manejo de clientes y la materializacioacuten de un 'workfare' o hasta 'shadow state'. Actualmente, el estado de bienestar en Los Angeles County combina la circunvolucioacuten de Franz Kafka con la miseria de Charles Dickens. Mientras que nuestra criacutetica compensa, hasta cierto punto, la carencia tan grave de estudios de casos locales, todaviacutea hace falta una investigacioacuten de ejemplos de nuevos espacios reguladores locales, para profundizar nuestro conocimiento del empleo de varias estrateacutegicas, mecanismos y hasta resistencia

Geography · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · Welfare · Welfare state · Homelessness and Social Issues · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Mathematics · Public Administration · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Partnerships and governance

    Open Access•Geerhardt Kornatowski•City Culture and Society•2010

  • Planning and designing universal access to social services. A pioneering local program on welfare spaces in Italy

    Open Access•Massimo Bricocoli, Benedetta Marani et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2023

  • Managing service hubs in Miami and Osaka

    Open Access•Geoffrey Deverteuil, Matthew D Marr et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2022

  • Can resilience be redeemed

    Open Access•Geoffrey Deverteuil, Geoff Deverteuil et al.•City•2016

  • Austerity Britain, poverty management and the missing geographies of mental health

    Open Access•James Lowe, Geoffrey Deverteuil•Health & Place•2020

  • Welfare Neighborhoods

    Geoffrey De Verteuil•Journal of Poverty•2005

  • Progressive Welfare Reform? Ending General Assistance Cash Grants for Homeless People in San Francisco

    Darren Noy•Journal of Poverty•2009

  • Anywhere But Here”

    Open Access•Deyanira Nevarez Martinez•Urban Affairs Review•2023

  • Investable poverty

    Open Access•T Baker, Joshua Evans et al.•Progress in Human Geography•2019

  • Geography and social policy

    Open Access•John Mohan•Progress in Human Geography•2003

  • Homelessness in Berlin

    Jürgen Von Mahs•Urban Geography•2011

  • At Street Level

    J Proudfoot, Erin Mccann et al.•Urban Geography•2008

  • Welfare Reform, Institutional Practices, and Service-Delivery Settings 1

    Geoffrey Deverteuil•Urban Geography•2003

  • From E1 to 90057

    Geoffrey Deverteuil•Urban Geography•2011

  • The Relationship between Government Assistance and Housing Outcomes among Extremely Low-income Individuals

    Geoffrey Deverteuil•Housing Studies•2005

  • The local state and homeless shelters

    Open Access•Geoffrey Deverteuil•Cities•2006

  • Compassionate” Strategies of Managing Homelessness

    Open Access•Stacey Murphy•Antipode•2009

  • Modes of Attentiveness

    Open Access•Jon May, Paul Cloke•Antipode•2014

  • Local Welfare Systems

    Open Access•Alberta Andreotti, Enzo Mingione et al.•Urban Studies•2012

  • Fiscal Consequences of Concentrated Poverty in a Metropolitan Region

    Pascale Joassart‐marcelli, Pascale M Joassart-Marcelli et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2005

  • Out from the (Green) shadow? Neoliberal hegemony through the market logic of shared urban environmental governance

    Open Access•Harold A Perkins•Political Geography•2009

  • Spaces of abeyance, care and survival

    Open Access•Geoffrey Deverteuil, Robert Wilton•Political Geography•2009

  • Green Spaces of Self-Interest Within Shared Urban Governance

    Open Access•Harold A Perkins•Geography Compass•2010

  • The Geographies of Poverty and Welfare

    Open Access•Paul Milbourne•Geography Compass•2010

  • Homeless Mobility, Institutional Settings, and the New Poverty Management

    Open Access•Geoffrey Deverteuil•Environment and Planning A…•2003

  • Workfare and resistance in the US

    Open Access•Julie Macleavy•Geographical Journal•2015

  • Theorizing Regulation-in-City for Homeless People's Subaltern Strategy and Informality

    Open Access•Mahito Hayashi•Critical Sociology•2022

  • State Apparatus

    Gordon L Clark, Michael Dear•State Apparatus•2021

  • Towards a Schumpeterian Workfare State? Preliminary Remarks on Post-Fordist Political Economy

    B Jessop•Studies in Political Economy•1993

  • Neoliberalizing states

    Open Access•J Peck•Progress in Human Geography•2001

  • The Possibility of Local Autonomy

    Michael P Brown•Urban Geography•1992

  • Homeless in Philadelphia

    Anthony P Halter, Anthony Halter•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•1992

  • A Man Without a Job is a Dead Man

    Kathleen A Kost•The Journal of Sociology & Social…•1997

  • The Unequal Homeless

    Cynthia J Bogard, Joanne Passaro•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997

  • Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs

    Michael Lipsky•Social Service Review•1984

  • Privatisation and the Local Welfare State

    Glenda Laws•Transactions of the Institute of…•1988

  • A Smoking Gun

    Open Access•Andrew Kirby•Policy Studies Journal•1990

  • Regulation Theory, the Local State, and the Transition of Urban Politics

    Open Access•Marjorie Goodwin, S Duncan et al.•Environment and Planning D…•1993

  • Runaway Train? The Diffusion of State-Level Reform in ADC/AFDC Eligibility Requirements, 1950-1967

    Sarah A Soule, Yvonne Zylan•American Journal of Sociology•1997

  • Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state

    Katharyne Mitchell•Economy and Society•2001

Unique citing works27
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2003 - 2023 (21)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 27

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae