The One-Child Policy in Shanghai
Acceptance and Internalization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4974804 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yilin Nie (Yale University), Robert J Wyman (Yale University) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 313-336 |
| Publication date | 2005-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Population and Development Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0098-7921 • E-ISSN: 1728-4457 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00067.x |
| OpenAlex | W2162445176 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 23 |
China's one-child policy is a major example of social engineering and the subject of human rights concerns. Given the significance of the policy, it is important to ascertain the attitudes of Chinese citizens. We conducted interviews in 2003 with residents of Shanghai who were of childbearing age either at the policy's inception or at the time of the interview. Our respondents, who were generally well educated, did not perceive the policy as extraordinary when it was introduced; resignation to one more intrusive government regulation was mixed with understanding and even approval of the policy. People talked about the political and social context, demographic concerns, family economic strategy, and the results of government-engineered gender equality. Among the young interviewees, the context has changed from a population striving to get by under tight government control to a much richer population that is upwardly mobile and perceives their local government to be basically beneficial. The one-child family is considered normal; few are still concerned with the policy per se, while others see it as unnecessary. The one-child policy seems to reflect Shanghainese current preferences; its status as a legal requirement may be largely irrelevant
China · Context (archaeology) · Economic growth · Economics · Family planning · Family planning policy · Geography · Government (linguistics) · One-child policy · Political science · Politics · Population · Public policy · Social policy · Sociology · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Law · Sex work and related issues
Below Replacement Fertility Preferences in Shanghai
China’s Population Policy at the Crossroads
Investing in the Future
Greasing the wheels of policy reversal
Emotion Coaching Intervention for Chinese Mothers of Preschoolers
Charging Complicity in Abuses, Ignoring Beneficial Engagement
The empowerment of singleton daughters
China's Demographic Reality and Future
Which women stop at one child in Australia
Ageing of a giant
Persistent effects of China’s one-child policy on childbearing attitudes of the Chinese diaspora in the United States
If Science Had Come First
Only Children and Low Family Size Ideals
The Astonishing Population Averted by China’s Birth Restrictions
The End of "Lowest-Low" Fertility
How genuine are sub-replacement ideal family sizes in urban China
"As Good as a Boy" But Still a Girl
Fertility in China
Universal yet local
Les préférences de fécondité à Shanghai dans un contexte de basse fécondité
Morality, Cosmopolitanism, or Academic Attainment? Discourses on "Quality" and Urban Chinese-Only-Children's Claims to Ideal Personhood
The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy
The Intergenerational Effect and Second Childbirth
China's changing population
Snowball Sampling
China’s Changing Population
Only Hope
Fresh Winds in Beijing
Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
Science, Modernity, and the Making of China's One-Child Policy
The Future Population of the World
China's One-Child Family Policy
Restraining Population Growth in Three Chinese Villages, 1988-93
China
China's Floating Population
Chinese Reproductive Policy at the Turn of the Millennium
The Economic Effects of Immigration into the United Kingdom
Slaughter of the Innocents
Policy Implementation in Post-Mao China
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,21 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |