Appraising psychotherapy case studies in practice-based evidence
Introducing Case Study Evaluation-tool (CaSE)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4987726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Greta Kaluzeviciute (0000-0003-1197-177X, University of Essex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9-9 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0102-7972 • E-ISSN: 1678-7153 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s41155-021-00175-y |
| PMID | 33740151 |
| OpenAlex | W3138423279 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 61 |
Systematic case studies are often placed at the low end of evidence-based practice (EBP) due to lack of critical appraisal. This paper seeks to attend to this research gap by introducing a novel Case Study Evaluation-tool (CaSE). First, issues around knowledge generation and validity are assessed in both EBP and practice-based evidence (PBE) paradigms. Although systematic case studies are more aligned with PBE paradigm, the paper argues for a complimentary, third way approach between the two paradigms and their 'exemplary' methodologies: case studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Second, the paper argues that all forms of research can produce 'valid evidence' but the validity itself needs to be assessed against each specific research method and purpose. Existing appraisal tools for qualitative research (JBI, CASP, ETQS) are shown to have limited relevance for the appraisal of systematic case studies through a comparative tool assessment. Third, the paper develops purpose-oriented evaluation criteria for systematic case studies through CaSE Checklist for Essential Components in Systematic Case Studies and CaSE Purpose-based Evaluative Framework for Systematic Case Studies. The checklist approach aids reviewers in assessing the presence or absence of essential case study components (internal validity). The framework approach aims to assess the effectiveness of each case against its set out research objectives and aims (external validity), based on different systematic case study purposes in psychotherapy. Finally, the paper demonstrates the application of the tool with a case example and notes further research trajectories for the development of CaSE tool
Alternative medicine · Case study research · Checklist · Cognitive psychology · Critical appraisal · Evidence-based practice · External validity · Internal validity · Management science · MEDLINE · Political science · Relevance (law) · Research design · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Systematic review · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Computer Science · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology
Host Range and Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens
Meta-analysis of qualitative studies
Generalizing From Single Case Studies
Evidence based medicine
The art of case study research
Prenatal Care Use Among Women of Low Income
Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology
Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy
A prospective interpretation of unconscious processes during psychoanalytic psychotherapy
I can do it (all) myself
Qualitative Metasynthesis
Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research
Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research
An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies
The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity
Practice-Based Evidence Study Design for Comparative Effectiveness Research
Scientific thinking styles
The Case History
Re-Reading “Little Hans”
Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education
The Empirical Status of Empirically Supported Psychotherapies
A Comparative Analysis of Three Online Appraisal Instruments' Ability to Assess Validity in Qualitative Research
Practice-based Evidence
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |