Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How (Not) to Properly Abandon the Improper

Bibliographic Data

ID5012254
AuthorsIgnaas Devisch (0000-0002-8520-4832, University of Ghent – Artevelde University College, Lange Boomgaardstraat 8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)
Year2013
Volume18
Issue3
Pages69-81
Publication date2013-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAngelaki (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0969-725X • E-ISSN: 1469-2899
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0969725x.2013.834665
OpenAlexW2067939838
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited16

Today, the improper is not only a philosophical issue; it is also a political question. In particular, striving to abandon the improper is central to the contemporary political agenda in many Western countries. Given the risks of a political agenda abandoning the improper in a proper way and realizing a closed community, contemporary philosophers such as Roberto Esposito and Jean-Luc Nancy have thought about the relationship between the proper and improper. It is remarkable that Martin Heidegger is an exemplary figure in the analyses of both philosophers. I will analyze Heidegger's line of thought on this issue and how Esposito and Nancy have responded to it. Both Esposito and Nancy state that it is impossible to abandon the improper in a proper way in their writings on community. Every proper existence is always marked by impropriety, Nancy and Esposito argue; there is no original or proper commonality that would liberate us from all things improper. Even before one can appropriate one's property, it is already traversed by the improper. The question how not to abandon properly the improper? is in fact one of the imperatives behind their arguments: if indeed the proper is always already, in one way or another, related to or contaminated by the improper, it is indeed an illusion to think we can simply leave the improper behind

Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Computer Science · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Philosophy

  • Augmented or stunted hospitality workers

    Alper Aslan•Current Issues in Tourism•2024

  • The Caring Organization

    Open Access•Ignaas Devisch•International Journal of…•2015

  • Improper communities in the work of Roberto Esposito and Jacques Rancière

    Open Access•Kevin Inston•Contemporary Political Theory•2020

  • The camp and the question of community

    Open Access•Richard Carter-White, C Minca•Political Geography•2020

  • Community, Immunity, and the Properan Introduction to the Political Theory of Roberto Esposito

    Greg Bird, Jonathan Short•Angelaki•2013

  • Politics of Security

    Michael Dillon•Politics of Security•1996

  • Bios, Immunity, Life

    Timothy Campbell•diacritics•2006

  • The Immunization Paradigm

    Roberto Esposito, Timothy Campbell•diacritics•2006

  • The being-with of being-there

    Open Access•Jean-Luc Nancy, Jean‐luc Nancy•Man and World•2008

  • The immunitary turn in current talk on biopolitics

    Open Access•Roberto Farneti•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2011

  • Otherness and individuation in Heidegger

    Open Access•Fran ois Raffoul, Fran�ois Raffoul•Continental Philosophy Review•1995

  • Neither an Accident nor a Mistake

    Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Paula Wissing•Critical Inquiry•1989

  • Biopolitics for philosophers

    Massimo Meloni, Maurizio Meloni•Economy and Society•2010

Citations per year0.38
Citation span2013 - 2024 (12)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae