Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

"Look up!" Using easy words to explain how we learn hard words and other aspects of language, an interview with Lila Gleitman

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5013687
AutoresVictor Gomes (0000-0002-6838-7294), Victor Vinícius Almeida Gomes (University of Pennsylvania), Antônio De Carvalho (0000-0002-2938-0049, University of Pennsylvania), Alex De Carvalho (0000-0001-6525-3170)
Año2018
Volumen14
Número3
Páginas12-20
Fecha de publicación2018-12-30
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRevista Linguíʃtica (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1808-835X • E-ISSN: 2238-975X
EditorialRevista Linguistica (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.31513/linguistica.2018.v14n3a22643
OpenAlexW2947934319
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas6

Lila Gleitman is undoubtedly one of the world's foremost experts on language acquisition and developmental psycholinguistics. Starting in the 60s, she rose to prominence by bringing experimental methods from psychology to bear on the questions raised by linguistics and philosophers of language, namely how children could learn the rules of a language when there is so much ambiguity both in the language and in the world surrounding them. She has done much work in this vein, focusing both on how children learn words that refer to abstract concepts such as think or believe, as well as how they acquire concepts when they lack certain inputs, such as in the case of blind or deaf children. Though her contributions and collaborations span many questions and problems in language acquisition, she is perhaps best known for proposing and showing that, from an early age, children are capable of using syntactic cues to learn the meaning of words, particularly verbs (especially those she describes as "hard words" because they are difficult or impossible to observe, like think). Through this process, termed syntactic bootstrapping, young children would be able rely on the linguistic context in which the words appear to discover aspects of the meanings of words that they don't know yet (e.g., Landau & Gleitman, 1985; Gleitman, 1990; Gleitman, Cassidy, Nappa, Papafragou, & Trueswell, 2005). More specifically, Lila and her collaborators proposed that syntax could serve as a "zoom lens" allowing language learners to figure out which part of the world is being talked about, which would then help them identify candidate meanings for novel words (e.g., Fisher, Hall, Rakowitz, & Gleitman, 1994). ---DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31513/linguistica.2018.v14n3a22643

Ambiguity · Cognitive science · Language acquisition · Linguistics · Syntax · Utterance · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language Development and Disorders · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later

    Open Access•Erica A Cartmill, Benjamin F Armstrong et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Understanding how input matters

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lidz, Henry Gleitman et al.•Cognition•2003

  • The current status of the motherese hypothesis

    Open Access•Lila R Gleitman, Elissa L Newport et al.•Journal of Child Language•1984

  • Language and Experience

    John Neil Bohannon, Barbara Landau et al.•Language•1986

  • Language Learnability and Language Development

    Clifton Pye, Steven Pinker•Language•1985

  • Lexical reconciliation

    Open Access•Jane Grimshaw•Lingua•1994

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae