Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5080177 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ineke Van Den Berg, Wilfried Admiraal, W F Admiraal (0000-0002-1627-3420, Utrecht University), Albert Pilot (0000-0003-2168-6825, Utrecht University) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 341-356 |
| Publication date | 2006-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075070600680836 |
| OpenAlex | W2002049096 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 34 |
| References cited | 6 |
This study was aimed at finding effective ways of organising peer assessment of written assignments in the context of teaching history at university level. To discover features yielding optimal results, several peer assessment designs were developed, implemented in courses and their learning outcomes evaluated. Outcomes were defined in terms of the revisions students made, the grades of the written products, and the perceived progress of products and writing skills. Most students processed peer feedback and perceived improvement in their writing as a result of peer assessment. Significant differences between grades of groups using or not using peer assessment were not found. Most teachers saw better‐structured interaction on the subject of writing problems in their classes. Important design features seemed to be the timing of peer assessment, so that it will not coincide with staff assessment, the assessment being reciprocal, and the assessment being performed in feedback groups of three or four students
Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · Peer feedback · Peer review · Reciprocal · Writing assessment · Educational Technology and Assessment · Higher Education Learning Practices · Medicine · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
Peer Review in a Social Policy Course
A 'Seasonal Stew' -- Food for Thought; Fuel for Action
Factors influencing peer learning and performance in Mooc asynchronous online discussion forum
Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used
The Effects of Writing Anxiety and Motivation on EFL College Students’ Self-Evaluative Judgments of Corrective Feedback
Effective peer assessment processes
Enhancing the Quality of Research Synopsis of International Students Through Peer Feedback
Designing Synchronous Online Learning and Teaching Lab
Using Peer Review for Student Performance Enhancement
Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community
Examining attributes of preservice teachers’ vulnerability
Backward evaluation in peer assessment
Online peer feedback via Moodle forum
Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking
The Perceived Value of Informal, Peer Critique in the Instructional Design Studio
Hispanic Preservice Teachers’ Peer Evaluations of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Development
Formative peer assessment to enhance primary school pupils’ oral skills
Implementation of PjBL With Remote Lab Enhances the Professional Skills of Engineering Students
Student peer review
Moving feedback forward
How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback
A systematic review on peer assessment
Group peer assessment for summative evaluation in a graduate-level statistics course for ecologists
Fostering oral presentation performance
Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment
How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study
Student perspectives on formative peer assessment
Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process
Práticas de avaliação de dois professores universitários
Peer assessment without assessment criteria
Master's thesis supervision
The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence
Ensino E Avaliação No Ensino Superior
| Unique citing works | 34 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 30 |