Defending 'Defending Musical Perdurantism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5081044 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ben Caplan, Carl Matheson |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 80-85 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Aesthetics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-0904 • E-ISSN: 1468-2842 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/aesthj/aym037 |
| OpenAlex | W2026425616 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Julian Dodd has recently objected to musical perdurantism—the view that a musical work is a fusion of performances—on the grounds that it entails that one cannot hear all of a musical work and that a musical work can have temporal parts that belong to different ontological categories. We defend musical perdurantism from both objections
Aesthetics · Art · Linguistics · Literature · Musical · Work (physics · Engineering · Music History and Culture · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2008 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |