Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Patenting Personalized Medicine

Molecules, Information, and the Body

Bibliographic Data

ID5083558
AuthorsMario Biagioli (0000-0003-0271-2979, corresponding author), Alain Pottage (0000-0003-4621-3311, Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris)
Year2021
Volume36
Pages221-240
Publication date2021-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOsiris (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0369-7827 • E-ISSN: 1933-8287
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/713991
OpenAlexW3194166441
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited20

The histories of patent law and medical practice in the United States have intersected in various ways over the past 150 years, beginning with the professional campaign against “patent medicines” in the late nineteenth century, and culminating, for now, in attempts to patent the diagnostic procedures discussed in this article. The patenting of diagnostic procedures provokes a set of fundamental questions about the episteme of patent law. These questions are not new. They emerged at the very origins of patent jurisprudence, centered on the question of what distinguished an invention from a law of nature, and this question of patentability has persistently reemerged over the past century in the contexts of plant breeding, biotechnology, and now diagnostic medicine. So far, the question has been addressed in terms that imagine the invention as a machine, understood in the figurative sense of a transformative organization of forces and elements. But diagnostic procedures, because they address the body informationally, as a system based on the recursive patterning of signals rather than a linear transformation of inputs into outputs, stretch the figure of the machine to the point at which it ceases to be effective. How then should one define and delimit invention

Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Intellectual property · Invention · Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Patent law · Patentability · Political science · Sociology · Transformative learning · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Computer Science · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Engineering · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Philosophy

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influence 2023

    James Evans, Tyler Reigeluth et al.•Isis•2023

  • The Intellectual Property Turn in Global Health

    Laura G Pedraza-Fariña•Osiris•2021

  • Shit, in Silico

    Open Access•Sonja Van Wichelen•Public Culture•2023

  • Biolegality

    Sonja Van Wichelen, Marc De Leeuw•Annual Review of Anthropology•2022

  • The Birth of Bioethics

    Albert R Jonsen•The birth of bioethics•1998

  • Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research

    Open Access•Michael Heller, Michael A Heller et al.•Science•1998

  • Law machines

    Open Access•Alain Pottage•Social Studies of Science•2011

  • Pharmaceutical patenting and the transformation of American medical ethics

    Open Access•Joseph M Gabriel•The British Journal for the…•2016

  • Intangible machines

    Open Access•Brad Sherman•History of Science•2019

  • Weighing intellectual property

    Open Access•Mario Biagioli•History of Science•2019

  • Patent Republic

    Open Access•Mario Biagioli•Social research•2006

  • Making PCR

    Paul Rabinow•Making PCR•1996

  • Postindustrial Metabolism

    H Landecker•Public Culture•2013

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,8
Citation span2021 - 2023 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae