Our befores and our afters
Another antipodean perspective on Bernard Smith
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5118664 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert W Gaston (The University of Melbourne, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 160 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 129-157 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Thesis Eleven (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0725-5136 • E-ISSN: 1461-7455 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0725513620963510 |
| OpenAlex | W3092861836 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Much has been published on the career and scholarly achievements of Bernard Smith (1916-2011) since his retirement from teaching in 1977 and has predictably gathered pace after his death. It is clear that the reception of his very substantial body of writings, addressing so many fields within the humanities, critical thought and art history in particular, is only just beginning. The present study focuses on a large recent collection of Smith's studies in which critical responses are integrated. I argue that the profoundly personal nature of historiography, necessarily incorporating praise and blame in its rhetorical structure, requires that the critic position oneself openly in relation to the life and work of the subject undergoing scrutiny. Smith's antipodean experience was in many ways distinctive. But those of us who knew him personally, or felt his influence as a teacher and writer, will need to reassess honestly their own genesis in order to deal effectively with the challenges embedded in his work
Aesthetics · Art · Blame · Epistemology · Historiography · Literature · Political science · Praise · Rhetorical question · Scrutiny · Sociology · Irish and British Studies · Law · Modernist Literature and Criticism · Philosophy · Psychology · Samuel Beckett and Modernism · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |