Validity and reliability of the Baecke questionnaire for the evaluation of habitual physical activity among people living with HIV/Aids
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5168934 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex Antonio Florindo (0000-0002-4429-0826, Universidade de São Paulo), Maria Do Rosário Dias De Oliveira Latorre (0000-0002-5189-3457, Universidade de São Paulo), Elisabete Cristina Morandi Dos Santos (0000-0001-6689-4519, Universidade de São Paulo), Carlos Eduardo Negrão (0000-0003-4652-1226, Universidade de São Paulo), Luciene Ferreira Azevedo (Universidade de São Paulo), Aluisio Augusto Cotrim Segurado (0000-0002-6311-8036, Universidade de São Paulo) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 535-541 |
| Publication date | 2006-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cadernos de Saude Publica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0102-311X • E-ISSN: 1678-4464 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000300008 |
| PMID | 16583097 |
| OpenAlex | W2000471304 |
| SciELO | S0102-311X2006000300008 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 16 |
This study evaluates the validity and reliability of the Baecke questionnaire on habitual physical activity when applied to a population of HIV/AIDS subjects. Validity was determined by comparing measurements for 30 subjects of peak oxygen uptake, peak workload, and energy expenditure with scores for occupational physical activity (OPA), physical exercise in leisure (PEL), leisure and locomotion activities (LLA), and total score (TS). Reliability was determined by testing and retesting 29 subjects at intervals of 15-30 days. Validity was evaluated with the Pearson correlation and reliability analyses were done using the intraclass correlation, paired Student t-test, and Bland-Altman methods. Peak VO2 and peak workload had significant correlation with PEL (r = 0.41; r = 0.43; respectively). Energy expenditure had a significant correlation with OPA (r = 0.64). The intraclass coefficients were 0.70 or more for OPA, PEL and TS. There was no difference in OPA, PEL, LLA and TS between the two evaluations. The Bland-Altman methods showed that there was good agreement between the measurements for all habitual physical activities scores. Results show that the Baecke questionnaire is valid for the evaluation of habitual physical activity among people living with HIV/AIDS
Correlation · Energy expenditure · Environmental health · Heart rate · Intraclass correlation · Limits of agreement · Nuclear medicine · Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient · Physical activity · Physical therapy · Population · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor) · Statistics · Total energy expenditure · Validity · VO2 max · Workload · Clinical Psychology · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management · HIV-related health complications and treatments · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Internal Medicine · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology
Association between diet quality, physical activity and anthropometric status of people living with HIV in Cape Town
Physical activity levels, cardiovascular risk, and self-perceived barrier to physical activity in people living with HIV in Maranhão, Brazil
Physical activity behaviours of persons living with HIV of low socioeconomic status
Caminhada e gastos com saúde em adultos usuários do sistema público de saúde brasileiro
Central obesity and dietary intake in HIV/Aids patients
Validity of the Brazilian version of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire
Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity
A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies
A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires
Physical Activity and Public Health
A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults
Metodologia para a avaliação da atividade física habitual em homens com 50 anos ou mais
| Citations per year | 0.3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2026 (21) |
| Highly cited | No |