Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Popularizing Biotechnology

The Influence of Issue Definition

Bibliographic Data

ID5198366
AuthorsL Christopher Plein (University of Missouri, corresponding author)
Year1991
Volume16
Issue4
Pages474-490
Publication date1991-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224399101600403
OpenAlexW2108547411
LanguageEN
Citations received39
References cited11

In recent years, the image of biotechnology has been transformed from one of danger and uncertainty to one of opportunity and familiarity. This article explores the process of issue definition by examining the efforts of private interests and public officials. An analysis of interview data, public documents, and other sources reveals four methods of issue definition: (1) establishing the "biotechnology industry" as a collective voice, (2) forging alliances with established public and private interests, (3) associating biotechnology with popular issues on the policy agenda, and (4) discrediting opponents and critics of biotechnology. These methods of issue definition reveal the importance not only of defining a specific issue but also of influencing the context in which it is considered

Biology · Business · Political science · Public relations · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Biotechnology

  • Perception of gene technology, and food risks

    Michael Siegrist•Journal of Risk Research•2003

  • Biotechnology, media and public opinion across national boundaries

    Simon Priest, S H Priest•Ecquid Novi African Journalism…•2004

  • Traces of the Future

    Sherly N Hamilton•Science Fiction Studies•2003

  • Information Equity, Public Understanding of Science, and the Biotechnology Debate

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest•Journal of Communication•1995

  • Copper toxicity across salinities from freshwater to seawater in the euryhaline fish Fundulus heteroclitus

    Open Access•Jonathan Blanchard, Martin Grosell•Aquatic Toxicology•2006

  • Utopía u oportunidad fallida

    Lina María Céspedes Baez, Lina M Céspedes-Báez et al.•Utopía U Oportunidad Fallida•2017

  • Policy Discourses on Irregular Migration in Germany and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Bastian A Vollmer, B Vollmer•Policy Discourses on Irregular…•2014

  • Public attitudes to gene technology

    Open Access•Renato Schibeci, Ian Barns et al.•Public Understanding of Science•1997

  • Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer•Public Understanding of Science•2002

  • Reading risk

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig•Public Understanding of Science•1993

  • Knowing your genes

    Open Access•Rosaleen Love•Public Understanding of Science•1996

  • Pandora's Box or panacea? Using metaphors to create the public representations of biotechnology

    Open Access•Miltos Liakopoulos•Public Understanding of Science•2002

  • The Role of Regulatory Agencies in Framing Public Problems

    Open Access•Edoardo Guaschino•European Policy Analysis•2018

  • Framing and governing cyber risks

    Ido Sivan-Sevilla, Ido Sivan‐sevilla•Journal of Risk Research•2019

  • Arenas, Platforms, and the Biotechnology Movement

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer•Science Communication•2002

  • Manufacturing consensus

    Ian Barns•Science as Culture•1995

  • No Longer Academic

    Daniel Patrick Thurs•Science as Culture•2007

  • Xenotransplantation

    Nik Brown•Science as Culture•1999

  • Gene technology, food production, and public opinion

    Open Access•Paul Sparks, Robert Shepherd et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•1994

  • Patenting politics

    Brian Rappert•New Political Science•1996

  • The changing uses of accuracy in science communication

    Open Access•Anders Hansen•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • The meat of the matter

    Open Access•Mike Michael, Nik Brown•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • Biotechnology in Australian Agriculture

    Open Access•Geoffrey Lawrence, Helen McKenzie et al.•Prometheus•1993

  • Biotechnology, media and public opinion across national boundaries

    Susanna Hornig Priest•Ecquid Novi African Journalism…•2004

  • Problematic Publics

    Open Access•Aidan Davison, Ian Barns et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•1997

  • Marketing Science

    Open Access•Dana Fennell•Journal of Communication Inquiry•2009

  • How European and U.S. Genetic Engineering Scientists View the Impact of Public Attention on Their Field

    Open Access•Isaac Rabino•Science Technology & Human Values•1994

  • Agenda Setting, Problem Definition, and Policy Studies

    Open Access•L Christopher Plein•Policy Studies Journal•1994

  • Explaining political attention allocation with the help of issue character

    Open Access•Petya Alexandrova•European Political Science Review•2016

  • Problem Definitions and Policy Contradictions

    Open Access•W David Kay•Policy Studies Journal•2003

  • Localized Debates of Agricultural Biotechnology in Community Newspapers

    Open Access•Catherine Emma Crawley•Science Communication•2007

  • Structuring Public Debate on Biotechnology

    Open Access•Susanna Hornig Priest•Science Communication•1994

  • Media Attention and Exposure in Relation to Support for Agricultural Biotechnology

    Open Access•John C Besley, Jarrod Shanahan et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • Biotechnology and the American Media

    Open Access•Matthew C Nisbet, Bruce V Lewenstein•Science Communication•2002

  • Genetic Technologies Meet the Public

    Open Access•Jesper Lassen, Andrew Jamison•Science Technology & Human Values•2006

  • Switching between Science and Culture in Transpecies Transplantation

    Open Access•Nik Brown, Mike Michael•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

  • GM Plants, Farmers and the Public - A Harmonious Relation

    Open Access•Jesper Lassen, Peter Sandøe•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Between the Mundane and the Exotic

    Open Access•Mike Michael•Time & Society•2003

  • Drawing Bright Lines

    Open Access•Richard Milne•The Sociological Review•2010

  • Genetic alchemy

    Sheldon Krimsky•Genetic alchemy•1982

  • Selling Science

    Dorothy Nelkin•Selling Science•1988

  • The new politics of science

    David Dickson•The new politics of science•1984

  • Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

    John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  • Genetic Alchemy

    Michael G Morgan, Sheldon Krimsky•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1983

  • Congressional Consideration of Biotechnology

    Open Access•L Christopher Plein, Douglas Webber et al.•Policy Studies Journal•1988

  • The State Role in Regulating Biotechnology

    Open Access•R Steven Brown•Policy Studies Journal•1988

  • Biotechnology in Agriculture and America's Competitiveness

    Open Access•Tom Harkin•Policy Studies Journal•1988

  • Two Faces of Power

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1962

Unique citing works39
Citations per year1,18
Citation span1993 - 2019 (27)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 35

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae