Identifying how Covid-19-related misinformation reacts to the announcement of the UK national lockdown
An interrupted time-series study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260432 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Green (0000-0002-0942-6628), Elena Musi (0000-0003-2431-455X), Francisco Rowe (0000-0003-4137-0246), Darren Charles, Frances Darlington‐pollock (0000-0001-5544-4459), Chris Kypridemos (0000-0002-0746-9229), Andrew Morse, Patrícia Rossini (0000-0002-7582-3867), John Tulloch (0000-0003-2150-0090), Andrew Davies (0009-0008-1324-3913), Emily Dearden (Public Health England, London, UK), Henrdramoorthy Maheswaran, Alex Singleton (0000-0002-2338-2334), Roberto Vivancos (0000-0002-8203-8867), Sally Sheard (0000-0001-8116-9120) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517211013869 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 28 |
COVID-19 is unique in that it is the first global pandemic occurring amidst a crowded information environment that has facilitated the proliferation of misinformation on social media. Dangerous misleading narratives have the potential to disrupt 'official' information sharing at major government announcements. Using an interrupted time-series design, we test the impact of the announcement of the first UK lockdown (8-8.30 p.m. 23 March 2020) on short-term trends of misinformation on Twitter. We utilise a novel dataset of all COVID-19-related social media posts on Twitter from the UK 48 hours before and 48 hours after the announcement (n = 2,531,888). We find that while the number of tweets increased immediately post announcement, there was no evidence of an increase in misinformation-related tweets. We found an increase in COVID-19-related bot activity post-announcement. Topic modelling of misinformation tweets revealed four distinct clusters: 'government and policy', 'symptoms', 'pushing back against misinformation' and 'cures and treatments
Government nation building and memetic reactions
Building Optimism Through Inspirational YouTube Videos During the Pandemic
Tourism content on Twitter (X) during a crisis
Compliant citizens, defiant rebels or neither? Exploring change and complexity in Covid‐19 vaccine attitudes and decisions in Bradford, UK
Studying the Covid-19 infodemic at scale
Testing and Not Testing for Coronavirus on Twitter
Automatic Time Series Forecasting
Public Health and Online Misinformation
Evaluating Covid-19 Public Health Messaging in Italy
Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models
Quasi-Poisson vs. Negative Binomial Regression
How epidemic psychology works on Twitter
Fighting Covid-19 Misinformation on Social Media
What types of Covid-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots
A geospatial infodemic
No disease for the others
Going viral
Who Tweets in the United Kingdom? Profiling the Twitter Population Using the British Social Attitudes Survey 2015
Covid-19 infodemic
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |