Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Capitalizing on transparency

Commercial surveillance and pharmaceutical marketing after the Physician Sunshine Act

Bibliographic Data

ID5260520
AuthorsShai Mulinari (0000-0001-8773-9796, Lund University, corresponding author), Piotr Ozieranski (0000-0002-2023-3288, University of Bath)
Year2022
Volume9
Issue1
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBig Data & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/20539517211069631
OpenAlexW4210931577
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited59

How corporations surveil and influence consumers using big data tools is a major area of research and public debate. However, few studies explore it in relation to physicians in the USA, even though they have been surveilled and targeted by the pharmaceutical industry since at least the 1950s. Indeed, in 2010, concerns about the pharmaceutical industry's undue influence led to the passing of the Physician Sunshine Act, a unique piece of transparency legislation that requires companies to report their financial ties to physicians and teaching hospitals in a public database. This article argues that while the Sunshine Act has clearly helped expose important commercial influences on both prescribing and the scale of industry involvement with physicians, it has also, paradoxically, fuelled further commercial surveillance and marketing. The article casts new light on innovative pharmaceutical marketing approaches and the key role of data brokers and analytics companies in the identification, targeting, managing, and surveillance of physicians. We place this analysis within the political economies of the pharmaceutical industry, surveillance-based marketing, and transparency, and argue that policies to promote increased transparency must be tightly tied to policies that impede the commodification and use of transparency data for surveillance and marketing purposes

Advertising · Analytics · Business · Commodification · Computer security · Data science · Economics · Legislation · Pharmaceutical industry · Pharmaceutical marketing · Political science · Politics · Postmarketing surveillance · Public relations · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Marketing

  • International comparison of pharmaceutical industry payment disclosures in the UK and Japan

    Open Access•Piotr Ozieranski, Hiroaki Saito et al.•Globalization and Health•2023

  • Stabilizing translucencies

    Open Access•Charlotte Högberg•Big Data & Society•2024

  • Enacting data context

    Open Access•L Poirier•Big Data & Society•2024

  • Drugs for Life

    Joseph Dumit•Drugs for Life•2012

  • Corporate Disguises in Medical Science

    Open Access•Sergio Sismondo•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2011

  • Data Capitalism

    Open Access•Sarah Myers West•Business & Society•2017

  • Targeting the American Market for Medicines, ca. 1950s–1970s

    Viviane Quirke•Bulletin of the history of medicine•2014

  • Prohibiting or ‘managing’ conflict of interest? A review of policies and procedures in three European drug regulation agencies

    Open Access•Joel Lexchin, Órla O’donovan et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Regulating Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing

    Open Access•Shai Mulinari•Sociology Compass•2016

  • Datafication, dataism and dataveillance

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Surveillance & Society•2014

  • The limits of transparency

    Open Access•Matthew Crain•New Media & Society•2016

  • The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state

    Open Access•Jo Bates•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • The future(s) of open science

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski, Robert Van Horn•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • Pharmaceutical Industry Support of US Patient Advocacy Organizations

    So-Yeon Kang, Ge Bai et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • The logic of strategic ignorance

    Open Access•Linsey Mcgoey•British Journal of Sociology•2012

  • Manipulate to empower

    Open Access•Aron Darmody, Detlev Zwick•Big Data & Society•2020

  • Big Data and surveillance

    Open Access•Karly Ball, Kirstie Ball et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • When data is capital

    Open Access•Jathan Sadowski•Big Data & Society•2019

  • Divergence and convergence of commercial and scientific priorities in drug development

    Open Access•Shai Mulinari•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Pills, Power, People

    Open Access•Joan Busfield•Sociology•2006

  • The sociology of pharmaceuticals

    Open Access•Simon J Williams, Jonathan Gabe et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2008

  • Sociology of pharmaceuticals development and regulation

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Sociology of Health & Illness•2008

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae