Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data

Bibliographic Data

ID5260640
AuthorsKirsten Ostherr (0000-0002-6425-9527, Rice University, corresponding author), Svetlana Borodina (0000-0003-3256-5463, Rice University), Rachel Conrad Bracken (0000-0001-5927-7248, Rice University), Charles Lotterman (Rice University), Eliot Storer (0000-0002-2892-4323, Rice University), Brandon Williams (0009-0003-2972-2699, Rice University)
Year2017
Volume4
Issue1
Publication date2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBig Data & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/2053951717704673
OpenAlexW2607060815
LanguageEN
Citations received18
References cited32

This study identifies and explores evolving concepts of trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data. We define "user-generated health data" as data captured through devices or software (whether purpose built or commercially available) and used outside of traditional clinical settings for tracking personal health data. The investigators conducted qualitative research through semistructured interviews (n = 32) with researchers, health technology start-up companies, and members of the general public to inquire why and how they interact with and understand the value of user-generated health data. We found significant results concerning new attitudes toward trust, privacy, and sharing of health data outside of clinical settings that conflict with regulations governing health data within clinical settings. Members of the general public expressed little concern about sharing health data with the companies that sold the devices or apps they used, and indicated that they rarely read the "terms and conditions" detailing how their data may be exploited by the company or third-party affiliates before consenting to them. In contrast, interviews with researchers revealed significant resistance among potential research participants to sharing their user-generated health data for purposes of scientific study. The widespread rhetoric of personalization and social sharing in "user-generated culture" appears to facilitate an understanding of user-generated health data that deemphasizes the risk of exploitation in favor of loosely defined benefits to individual and social well-being. We recommend clarification and greater transparency of regulations governing data sharing related to health

Computer security · Data science · Data sharing · Information privacy · Internet privacy · Personalization · Political science · Public health · Public relations · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

  • The role and nature of consent in government administrative data

    Open Access•Anna Sexton, Elizabeth Shepherd et al.•Big Data & Society•2018

  • Abandonment of personal quantification

    Open Access•Christiane Attig, Thomas Franke•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • Body, Capital, and Screens

    Open Access•Christian Bonah, Anja Laukötter•Body, Capital, and Screens•2020

  • Body, Capital and Screens

    Christian Bonah, Anja Laukötter•Body, Capital, and Screens•2020

  • FemTech

    Open Access•Lindsay Balfour•FemTech•2023

  • Trust in AI

    Open Access•Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • A critical discussion on applying user-generated content to interdisciplinary research in tourism and health science

    Jun Wen, Fangli Hu et al.•Current Issues in Tourism•2025

  • Tracking technologies in eHealth

    Open Access•Julien Cloarec, Charlotte Cadieu et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Periods as powerful data

    Open Access•Bryndl Hohmann‐marriott•New Media & Society•2021

  • Trust in open data applications through transparency

    Open Access•Christian Wiencierz, Marco Lünich•New Media & Society•2020

  • Ethical and legal governance of health-related research that use digital data from user-generated online health content

    Pamela Andanda•Information Communication & Society•2020

  • Digital health and primary care

    Open Access•Claudia Pagliari•Journal of Global Health•2021

  • Limits of data anonymity

    Open Access•Felix Gille, Caroline Brall•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2021

  • Low on trust, high on use

    Open Access•David Mathieu, Jannie Møller Hartley•Big Data & Society•2021

  • The cancer multiple

    Open Access•Tiên-Dung Hà, Peter A Chow-White•Big Data & Society•2021

  • Designing privacy in personalized health

    Open Access•Thibaud Deruelle, Veronika Kalouguina et al.•Big Data & Society•2023

  • Data doxa

    Open Access•Gavin J D Smith•Big Data & Society•2018

  • Qualitative Research Ethics in the Big Data Era

    Open Access•Arielle Hesse, Leland Glenna et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2019

  • Self-Tracking

    Gina Neff, Dawn Nafus•Self-Tracking•2016

  • There is a blind spot in AI research

    Open Access•K Crawford, Ryan Calo•Nature•2016

  • The Black Box Society

    Frank Pasquale•Black Box Society•2015

  • The cultural economy in the digital age

    Open Access•Pierre-Jean Benghozi, Pierre‐jean Benghozi et al.•City Culture and Society•2016

  • Networked

    Lee Rainie, B Wellman•Networked•2012

  • Trust in Numbers

    Theodore M Porter•Trust in Numbers•1995

  • Trust in Numbers

    Theodore M Porter•Trust in Numbers•1995

  • Biopower Today

    Open Access•Paul Rabinow, Nikolas Rose•BioSocieties•2006

  • Datafication, dataism and dataveillance

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Surveillance & Society•2014

  • A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance

    Open Access•G Elmer•New Media & Society•2003

  • Panopticon.com

    John Edward Campbell, Matt Carlson•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2002

  • Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content

    Open Access•José Van Dijck•Media Culture & Society•2008

  • Security, Territory, Population

    Open Access•Arnold I Davidson, Graham Burchell et al.•Security, Territory, Population•2009

  • Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms

    Open Access•José Van Dijck, Thomas Poell•Big Data & Society•2016

  • Hacking the social life of Big Data

    Open Access•Jennifer Pybus, Muriel Côte et al.•Big Data & Society•2015

  • Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide

    Open Access•Jacob Metcalf, K Crawford•Big Data & Society•2016

  • Big Data ethics

    Open Access•Andrej Zwitter•Big Data & Society•2014

  • Data and agency

    Open Access•Helen Kennedy, Thomas Poell et al.•Big Data & Society•2015

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

  • Cancer Butch

    Open Access•Lochlann Jain•Cultural Anthropology•2007

Unique citing works18
Citations per year2,25
Citation span2018 - 2025 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae