Trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260640 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kirsten Ostherr (0000-0002-6425-9527, Rice University, corresponding author), Svetlana Borodina (0000-0003-3256-5463, Rice University), Rachel Conrad Bracken (0000-0001-5927-7248, Rice University), Charles Lotterman (Rice University), Eliot Storer (0000-0002-2892-4323, Rice University), Brandon Williams (0009-0003-2972-2699, Rice University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2053951717704673 |
| OpenAlex | W2607060815 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 32 |
This study identifies and explores evolving concepts of trust and privacy in the context of user-generated health data. We define "user-generated health data" as data captured through devices or software (whether purpose built or commercially available) and used outside of traditional clinical settings for tracking personal health data. The investigators conducted qualitative research through semistructured interviews (n = 32) with researchers, health technology start-up companies, and members of the general public to inquire why and how they interact with and understand the value of user-generated health data. We found significant results concerning new attitudes toward trust, privacy, and sharing of health data outside of clinical settings that conflict with regulations governing health data within clinical settings. Members of the general public expressed little concern about sharing health data with the companies that sold the devices or apps they used, and indicated that they rarely read the "terms and conditions" detailing how their data may be exploited by the company or third-party affiliates before consenting to them. In contrast, interviews with researchers revealed significant resistance among potential research participants to sharing their user-generated health data for purposes of scientific study. The widespread rhetoric of personalization and social sharing in "user-generated culture" appears to facilitate an understanding of user-generated health data that deemphasizes the risk of exploitation in favor of loosely defined benefits to individual and social well-being. We recommend clarification and greater transparency of regulations governing data sharing related to health
Computer security · Data science · Data sharing · Information privacy · Internet privacy · Personalization · Political science · Public health · Public relations · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Medicine · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
The role and nature of consent in government administrative data
Abandonment of personal quantification
Body, Capital, and Screens
Body, Capital and Screens
FemTech
Trust in AI
A critical discussion on applying user-generated content to interdisciplinary research in tourism and health science
Tracking technologies in eHealth
Periods as powerful data
Trust in open data applications through transparency
Ethical and legal governance of health-related research that use digital data from user-generated online health content
Digital health and primary care
Limits of data anonymity
Low on trust, high on use
The cancer multiple
Designing privacy in personalized health
Data doxa
Qualitative Research Ethics in the Big Data Era
Self-Tracking
There is a blind spot in AI research
The Black Box Society
The cultural economy in the digital age
Networked
Trust in Numbers
Trust in Numbers
Biopower Today
Datafication, dataism and dataveillance
A Diagram of Panoptic Surveillance
Panopticon.com
Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content
Security, Territory, Population
Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms
Hacking the social life of Big Data
Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide
Big Data ethics
Data and agency
Situated Knowledges
Cancer Butch
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |