The "black box" at work
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260908 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ifeoma Ajunwa (Cornell University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2053951720938093 |
| OpenAlex | W3094124460 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 31 |
An oversized reliance on big data-driven algorithmic decision-making systems, coupled with a lack of critical inquiry regarding such systems, combine to create the paradoxical "black box" at work. The "black box" simultaneously demands a higher level of transparency from the worker in regard to data collection, while shrouding the decision-making in secrecy, making employer decisions even more opaque to the worker. To access employment, the worker is commanded to divulge highly personal information, and when hired, must submit further still to algorithmic processes of evaluations which will make authoritative claims as to the workers' productivity. Furthermore, in and out of the workplace, the worker is governed by an invisible data-created leash deploying wearable technology to collect intimate worker data. At all stages, the worker is confronted with a lack of transparency, accountability, or explanation as to the inner workings or even the logic of the "black box" at work. This data revolution of the workplace is alarming for several reasons: (1) the "black box at work" not only serves to conceal disparities in hiring, but could also allow for a level of "data-laundering" that beggars any notion of equal opportunity in employment and (2) there exists, the danger of a "mission creep" attitude to data collection that allows for pervasive surveillance, contributing to the erosion of both the personhood and autonomy of workers. Thus, the "black box at work" not only enables worker domination in the workplace, it deprives the worker of Rawlsian justice
Accountability · Autonomy · Big data · Black box · Business · Computer security · Economic Justice · Internet privacy · Personhood · Political science · Public relations · Secrecy · Sociology · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Artificial Intelligence
Labour Struggles in Digital Capitalism
Aprovechando y expandiendo la hiperflexibilización del empleo. El modelo Uber en España
Discurso y trabajo de la economía colaborativa. El caso de Blablacar
Geographies of artificial intelligence
Wearable Technologies and Stress
Workers’ right to the subject
Algorithmic Agency and Autonomy in Archaeological Practice
Consent, coercion, colonialism
AI employment decision-making
Opening the black boxes of the black carpet in the era of risk society
Transparency in the datafied workplace
Dataficação da vida
Awareness, Motivation and Leadership in Production Systems
Empowering Digital Democracy
Good intentions in complex realities
Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management
In the age of the smart machine
The principles of scientific management
The Black Box Society
Towards a More Adequate Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice
On the People's Terms
A Theory of Justice
A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Nondomination
Big data
Should Rawls be a Socialist
Marxism, Morality, and Social Justice
Freedom, republicanism, and workplace democracy
Survey Article
Worker Participation
Private Government
Labor and Republican Liberty
Discipline and Punish
Critical Questions for Big Data
Between the Labor Process and the State
An Electronic Panopticon? A Sociological Critique of Surveillance Theory
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |