Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Counting and cardinality in English nursery pupils

Bibliographic Data

ID5264185
AuthorsMichael Fluck (University of Portsmouth, corresponding author), Lynne Henderson (University of Portsmouth)
Year1996
Volume66
Issue4
Pages501-517
Publication date1996-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01215.x
PMID9008426
OpenAlexW2087751407
LanguageEN
Citations received4

This study examines the development of counting and cardinality in a structured sample of 60 English 3 1/2-41/2 year-olds attending local education authority nursery classes in socially mixed areas of Portsmouth. Children were given two types of task: counting sets of animals, and giving specified numbers of items from a pile. Three measures of cardinal understanding were used: spontaneous repetition of the last word on completion of a counting trial, repetition of the last word in reply to a question, and use of counting vs. grabbing when asked to give a specific number of items from a heap. In line with research on other populations the results indicate a pronounced developmental discrepancy between procedural and conceptual knowledge of counting, but cardinality appears to develop six months later in this population than in other populations studied. There were marked individual differences, however. Proficiency with object counting was found to be necessary, but not sufficient, for cardinal understanding. Children rarely repeated final count words spontaneously. Last word repetition in response to a verbal prompt depended on the nature of the prompt. Contrary to previous research, the present results indicate that last word repetition elicited by the prompt 'how many?' is not merely a conventional reply but generally implies an understanding of cardinality. The findings also indicate that an understanding of cardinality emerges relatively suddenly, consistent with the discovery or construction of a principle. Whether nursery pupils treat counting simply as a conventional routine without cardinal significance appears to depend on the situation as well as on their understanding of cardinality. The findings are discussed in relation to Karmiloff-Smith's Representational Redescription model

Cardinality (data modeling) · Linguistics · Population · Repetition (rhetorical device) · Child and Animal Learning Development · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Computer Science · Demography · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

  • How high can you count? Probing the limits of children’s counting

    Open Access•Tasha Posid, Sara Cordes•Developmental Psychology•2018

  • Does Counting Count for 3‐ to 4‐year‐olds? Parental Assumptions about Preschool Children's Understanding of Counting and Cardinality

    Open Access•Michael Fluck, Maggie Linnell et al.•Social Development•2005

  • Young children can add and subtract by predicting and checking

    Open Access•Osnat Zur, Renée Gelman et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2004

  • Learning to represent exact numbers

    Open Access•Barbara W Sarnecka•Synthese•2021

Citations per year0.18
Citation span2004 - 2021 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae