Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding effort regulation

Comparing 'Pomodoro' breaks and self-regulated breaks

Bibliographic Data

ID5264532
AuthorsFelicitas Biwer (0000-0003-4211-7234, Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands, corresponding author), Wisnu Wiradhany (0000-0001-8707-3146, Psychology Department, Faculty of Humanities Bina Nusantara University Jakarta Indonesia), M G A Oude Egbrink (0000-0002-5530-6598, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands), Anique B H De Bruin (0000-0001-5178-0287, Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, School of Health Professions Education (SHE) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands)
Year2023
Volume93
IssueS2
Pages353-367
Publication date2023-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjep.12593
PMID36859717
OpenAlexW4322753720
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited29

BackgroundDuring self-study, students need to monitor and regulate mental effort to replete working memory resources and optimize learning results. Taking breaks during self-study could be an effective effort regulation strategy. However, little is known about how breaktaking relates to self-regulated learning.AimsWe investigated the effects of taking systematic or self-regulated breaks on mental effort, task experiences and task completion in real-life study sessions for 1 day.SampleEighty-seven bachelor's and master's students from a Dutch University.MethodsStudents participated in an online intervention during their self-study. In the self-regulated-break condition (n = 35), students self-decided when to take a break; in the systematic break conditions, students took either a 6-min break after every 24-min study block (systematic-long or 'Pomodoro technique', n = 25) or a 3-min break after every 12-min study block (systematic-short, n = 27).ResultsStudents had longer study sessions and breaks when self-regulating. This was associated with higher levels of fatigue and distractedness, and lower levels of concentration and motivation compared to those in the systematic conditions. We found no difference between groups in invested mental effort or task completion.ConclusionsTaking pre-determined, systematic breaks during a study session had mood benefits and appeared to have efficiency benefits (i.e., similar task completion in shorter time) over taking self-regulated breaks. Measuring how mental effort dynamically fluctuates over time and how effort spent on the learning task differs from effort spent on regulating break-taking requires further research

Bachelor · Developmental psychology · Mood · Self-regulated learning · Session (web analytics) · Task (project management) · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Computer Science · Mind wandering and attention · Psychology · Social Psychology · Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

  • The Pipes System

    Open Access•Łukasz Jarosiński, Szymon Guguła•Education Sciences•2026

  • Unpacking self-regulation and social interaction in “Study With Me” videos through large-scale analytics

    Open Access•Tongxi Liu, Liping Deng et al.•Computers & Education•2026

  • Discussion of the special issue on cognitive load theory

    Open Access•John Sweller•British Journal of Educational…•2023

  • International Literacy Association's Timothy and Cynthia Shanahan Outstanding Dissertation Award

    Open Access•Katherine A Valentine, Katherine Valentine et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2026

  • Integrating cognitive load theory with other theories, within and beyond educational psychology

    Open Access•José Hanham, Juan Cristobal Castro‐alonso et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2023

  • The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load

    Open Access•Tina Seufert•Educational Research Review•2018

  • The Effort Paradox

    Open Access•Michael Inzlicht, Amitai Shenhav et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2018

  • Measurement of Cognitive Load in Instructional Research

    Open Access•Fred Paas, Fred G W C Paas et al.•Perceptual and Motor Skills•1994

  • Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics

    Fred Paas, Fred G W C Paas•Journal of Educational Psychology•1992

  • Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading

    Open Access•Laura L Bowman, Laura E Levine et al.•Computers & Education•2010

  • Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort

    Amitai Shenhav, Sebastian Musslick et al.•Annual Review of Neuroscience•2017

  • An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance

    Open Access•Robert Kurzban, Angela L Duckworth et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2013

  • Different effects of pausing on cognitive load in a medical simulation game

    Open Access•Joy Yeonjoo Lee, Jeroen Donkers et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • The medical pause

    Open Access•Joy Yeonjoo Lee, Adam Szulewski et al.•Medical Education•2021

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits

    Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan•Psychological Inquiry•2000

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae