Is there a biological basis in the selection of medicinal plants in the human species? An initial approach based on chemosensory perception of taste
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5282686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Temóteo Luiz Lima Da Silva, Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior (0000-0002-3128-0514), Ulysses Albuquerque (0000-0002-8131-8429) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnobiology and Conservation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2238-4782 • E-ISSN: 2238-4782 |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.15451/ec2020-01-9.03-1-15 |
| OpenAlex | W3000159471 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 26 |
The ability to identify tastes associated with plant chemicals may have favored humans in identifying plant chemists with pharmacological activity throughout human evolutionary history. The genetic basis of taste perception influences people's varying sensitivity to perceive chemical stimuli of taste. This biological basis can play an important role in plant selection to compose local medical systems, given the argument in the ethnobiological literature that plant taste can influence their selection as a medicinal resource. Thus, we sought to investigate whether there is a biological basis in the selection of these resources. Our investigation was made through the survey of ethnobiological data on the knowledge of medicinal plants and sensitivity data on the perception of bitter taste in two local communities. We tested whether local experts and active tasters of medicinal plants are more sensitive to the perception of bitter taste than the rest of the population. Additionally, we evaluated whether people who are more sensitive to bitter taste cite more plants with taste and assign more therapeutic targets to them. We did not corroborate any of our assumptions. It is likely that the bitter taste threshold is not as relevant in the selection of medicinal plants as the processes of cultural transmission
Biology · Bitter taste · Perception · Population · Selection (genetic algorithm · Taste · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Computer Science · Medicine · Neuroscience · Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Artificial Intelligence · Food Science
Short-term temporal analysis and children's knowledge of the composition of important medicinal plants
How does bitterness perception correlate with the intention to use traditional Chinese medicine? An analysis of double-edged sword effects based on the stimuli–organism–response framework
Local knowledge about medicinal plants does not influence the self-reported well-being of inhabitants of the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil
Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest
Treating leishmaniasis in Amazonia, part 2
Traditional plant use during lactation and postpartum recovery
How Do Local Medical Systems Work? An Overview of the Evidence
Perceived efficiency and local consensus as factors shaping medicinal plant knowledge
A theoretical review on the origin of medicinal practices in humans
Can organoleptic properties explain the differential use of medicinal plants? Evidence from Northeastern Brazil
The taste of heat
Chemosensory perception and medicinal plants for digestive ailments in a Mapuche community in NW Patagonia, Argentina
Taste of phytocompounds
Indigenous phytotherapy of gastrointestinal disorders in a lowland Mixe community (Oaxaca, Mexico)
Does Genetic Taste Sensitivity to PROP Influence Food Preferences and Body Weight
Relationships between threshold-based PROP sensitivity and food preferences of Tunisians
New perspectives on taste and primate evolution
Human Taste and Cognition in Tzeltal Maya Medicinal Plant Use
A Sensory Ecology of Medicinal Plant Therapy in Two Amazonian Societies
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |