Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effects of 10 Weeks Hangboard Training on Climbing Specific Maximal Strength, Explosive Strength, and Finger Endurance

Bibliographic Data

ID5284946
AuthorsEspen Hermans, Atle Hole Saeterbakken (0000-0002-5592-6551), Vegard Albert Vereide, Vegard Vereide, Ivar S O Nord, Nicolay Stien (0000-0001-5161-9055), Vidar Andersen (0000-0002-3496-8517)
Year2022
Volume4
Pages888158-888158
Publication date2022-04-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2022.888158
PMID35571743
OpenAlexW4224930274
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited35

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 10 weeks of hangboard training (HBT) on climbing-specific maximal strength, explosive strength, and muscular endurance. In total, 35 intermediate- to advanced-level climbers (8 women and 27 men) were randomized into a hangboard training group (HBT) or a control group (CON). The HBT program consisted of two sessions of 48 min per week using the Beastmaker 1000 series hangboard, and the following application to smartphone. Both groups continued their normal climbing training routines. Pre- and post-intervention, maximal peak force, maximal average force, and rate of force development (RFD) were measured while performing an isometric pull-up on a 23 mm deep campus rung and jug holds. In addition, finger endurance was measured by performing a sustained dead-hang test on the same rung. The HBT increased peak force and average force in 23 mm rung condition, average force in jug condition, and utilization rate øl,.- in peak force to a greater extent than CON (p = 0.001-0.031, ES = 0.29-0.66), whereas no differences were detected between groups in RFD (jug or 23 mm), peak force in jug condition, utilization rate in RFD, average force or in dead-hang duration (p = 0.056-0.303). At post-test, the HBT group demonstrated 17, 18, 28, 10, 11, and 12% improvement in peak force, average force, RFD in 23 mm rung condition, average force in jug condition, utilization rate in peak force, and dead-hang duration, respectively [p = 0.001-0.006, effect size (ES) = 0.73-1.12] whereas no change was observed in CON (p = 0.213-0.396). In conclusion, 10 weeks of HBT in addition to regular climbing was highly effective for increasing maximal finger strength compared with continuing regular climbing training for intermediate and advanced climbers

Climbing · Isometric exercise · Physical therapy · Structural engineering · Engineering · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Mathematics · Medicine · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training

  • Physical performance testing in climbing—A systematic review

    Open Access•Kaja Langer, Christian Simon et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2023

  • Comparing low volume of blood flow restricted to high-intensity resistance training of the finger flexors to maintain climbing-specific strength and endurance

    Open Access•Tomáš Javorský, Atle Hole Saeterbakken et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2023

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Tests and Procedures for Measuring Endurance, Strength, and Power in Climbing—A Mini-Review

    Open Access•Nicolay Stien, Atle Hole Saeterbakken et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2022

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae