Spatial indeterminacy and the construction of environmental knowledge
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5290628 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott Jiusto (Worcester Polytechnic Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 176 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 214-226 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00356.x |
| OpenAlex | W1993719627 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 26 |
As concern about the sustainability of industrialised economies has increased, analysts have developed various indicator-based methodologies to explore environmental policy implications of human consumption and production activities. Critical and social constructivist theorists have challenged the presumption of objectivity underlying such research, however, by highlighting the role that social process and tacit assumptions play in accounts of human-environment interactions. While the 'science wars' hostility between realists and constructivists has abated and many in both camps agree that environmental analysts should be more open and reflexive about the empirical limitations of their work and its potential to encode social, political and cultural bias, practical guidance and clear examples for doing so remain rare. This paper is situated within this gap: it is at once an attempt by an environmental analyst to show what a 'self-reflexive' approach to environmental assessment might look like and a rumination on the opportunities and challenges that such an undertaking entails. At the same time, the paper makes traditional scientific claims to creating new knowledge and advancing methodological sophistication by identifying a general problem of spatial indeterminacy that limits the empirical basis of all manner of place-based environmental assessment. The paper uses a climate change-related case study regarding the attribution of carbon emissions from electricity use to various US states to show the strong, though generally unrecognised, representational and political implications that can be introduced through the common methodological responses to spatial indeterminacy. I argue that in such cases both positivist and constructivist approaches to understanding human-environmental relations are needed to thoughtfully navigate options for constructing indicators and analysing policy options
Economics · Epistemology · Indeterminacy (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Science Studies
The American Evasion of Philosophy
Defining Uncertainty
The science question in feminism
Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
Risk, Environment and Modernity
Life‐Cycle Assessment
The Importance of LCAs—Warts and All
A Theoretical Foundation for Life‐Cycle Assessment
Site‐Dependent Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment of Acidification
How science makes environmental controversies worse
The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science
Risk society
Primate Visions
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
Science studies, climate change and the prospects for constructivist critique
| Highly cited | No |
|---|