Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Institutional Accreditation of SUS Ombudspersons

An analysis of the initial external evaluation experiences

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5335403
AutoresSandra Aparecida Venâncio De Siqueira (0000-0002-1439-2960, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, autor de correspondencia), Fernando Manuel Bessa Fernandes (0000-0002-8859-3626, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Caio Tavares Motta (0000-0001-7288-8350, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Murilo Da Conceição Cunha Wanzeler (0000-0002-6297-5124, Universidade Federal da Paraíba), José Inácio Jardim Motta (0000-0001-6435-1350, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz), Jorge Augusto Da Silva Santos (0000-0002-4203-3842, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz)
Año2022
Volumen46
Númerospe4
Páginas131-140
Fecha de publicación2022-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSaúde em Debate (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0103-1104 • E-ISSN: 2358-2898
EditorialFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/0103-11042022e410i
OpenAlexW4322582725
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas3

Based on the Qualification course of External Evaluators for the Accreditation process in the Unified Health System (SUS), held in 2018, this paper aims to discuss the challenges to the training process of these evaluators from a perspective of participatory evaluation to contribute to the improvement of external evaluation and self-evaluation devices. To this end, 33 documents produced with the practice of these devices were analyzed within the project. In external evaluation, the main challenge is to 'look at the other'. This specific type of perspective requires the External Evaluation Team's mastery over the previous knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the work to capture knowledge, intentions, and relationships expressed in the statements of the subjects. In self-evaluation, the main challenge is 'looking at oneself'. Taking oneself as an object of knowledge and field of transformation requires specific ways of doing to gain quality in work processes. Building a culture of evaluation in which the information produced supports decision-making is a challenge for the ombudspersons, which can be overcome with the Quality Benchmark of the Ombudsperson Services of the SUS

Accreditation · Business · Citizen journalism · Field (mathematics) · Knowledge management · Medical education · Participatory evaluation · Perspective (graphical) · Process (computing) · Process management · Quality (philosophy) · Sociology · Work (physics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Engineering · Health, Nursing, Elderly Care · Healthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic · Medicine · Public Health in Brazil

  • Avaliando a institucionalização da avaliação

    Open Access•André-Pierre Contandriopoulos, André‐pierre Contandriopoulos•Ciência & Saúde Coletiva•2006

  • Análise da atuação das ouvidorias estaduais do Sistema Único de Saúde como instâncias participativas

    Open Access•Fernando Manuel Bessa Fernandes, Marcelo Rasga Moreira et al.•Saúde em Debate•2016

  • Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência

    Open Access•Jorge Larrosa Bondía•Revista Brasileira de Educação•2002

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae