Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Creating Regulatory Harmony

The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making

Bibliographic Data

ID5337085
AuthorsColleen Lanier-Christensen (0000-0003-3100-5149, History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue5
Pages925-952
Publication date2021-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/01622439211029369
OpenAlexW3192557322
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited31

In recent decades, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has become a powerful forum for trade liberalization and regulatory harmonization. OECD members have worked to reconcile divergent national regulatory approaches, applying a single framework across sovereign states, in effect determining whose knowledge-making practices would guide regulatory action throughout the industrialized world. Focusing on US regulators, industry associations, and environmental groups, this article explores the participatory politics of OECD chemical regulation harmonization in the late 1970s to early 1980s. These efforts were conditioned by differential institutional access and resources among stakeholders who sought to shape regulatory knowledge rules. Facing competing European and US approaches to chemical data-a minimum "base set" of test data versus case-by-case determinations-OECD members chose the European approach in 1980. However, US regulatory politics shifted with the election of President Reagan, prompting industry associations to lobby the US government to block the agreement. Examining the micropolitics of these standards in the making, I demonstrate that while long-term structures advantaged industrial actors, ideological alignment with the US government precipitated their decisive influence. The case illustrates the importance of attending to the distinctive politics of international harmonization and the effects on transnational knowledge-making and regulatory intervention

Citizen journalism · Economics · Harmonization · International trade · Liberalization · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regulatory state · Sovereignty · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Medical Research and Treatments · Law · Public Administration

  • The relational structure of corporate ignorance production

    Open Access•Gabriel Lévesque•Social Networks•2027

  • Knowledge Work as a Condition of Accumulation in the Pesticide Industry

    Open Access•Kees Jansen•Journal of Agrarian Change•2026

  • The matter and the metrics

    Open Access•Eva Vibeke Kofoed Pihl•Agriculture and Human Values•2026

  • The Effect of Collective Decision-Making on Productivity

    Open Access•Seyed Mohsen Mirbagheri, Ata Ollah Rafiei Atani et al.•SAGE Open•2023

  • Embrasser la cause des cancers professionnels. Bifurcation d'un service de l'OMS et de son créateur

    Open Access•Valentin Thomas•Sociologie du Travail•2023

  • Science in action

    Bruno Latour•Science in action•1987

  • The OECD and Transnational Governance

    Rianne Mahon, Stephen Mcbride•Oecd and Transnational Governance•2009

  • Scientists and the Regulation of Risk

    David Demortain•Scientists and the regulation of…•2011

  • The Hegemony of Growth

    Open Access•Matthias Schmelzer•Hegemony of Growth•2016

  • Seeds, Science, and Struggle

    Abby Kinchy•Seeds, Science, and Struggle•2012

  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

    Richard Woodward•The Organisation for Economic…•2009

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Labor and the Environmental Movement

    Brian K Obach•Labor and the Environmental…•2004

  • Standards

    Lawrence Busch•Standards•2011

  • Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government

    Open Access•Stephen R Barley•Organization Studies•2010

  • Open for Business

    Judith A Layzer•Open for business•2012

  • Residues

    Open Access•Soraya Boudia, Angela N H Creager et al.•Engaging Science Technology and…•2018

  • Inventing Prediction for Regulation

    Open Access•Henri Boullier, David Demortain et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2019

  • Progress, Innovation and Regulatory Science in Drug Development

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Social Studies of Science•2002

  • Non-stick science

    Open Access•Lauren Richter, Alissa Cordner et al.•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance

    Open Access•Cheryl Allyn Miller, Clark A Miller•Governance•2007

  • Risk, Science and Politics

    Open Access•George Hoberg•Canadian Journal of Political…•1990

  • To Test or Not to Test

    Open Access•Angela N H Creager•Science Technology & Human Values•2021

  • Science and Power in Global Food Regulation

    Open Access•David E Winickoff, Douglas M Bushey et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Biotechnology and Empire

    Sheila Jasanoff•Osiris•2006

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2027 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae