Creating Regulatory Harmony
The Participatory Politics of OECD Chemical Testing Standards in the Making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337085 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colleen Lanier-Christensen (0000-0003-3100-5149, History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 925-952 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01622439211029369 |
| OpenAlex | W3192557322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 31 |
In recent decades, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has become a powerful forum for trade liberalization and regulatory harmonization. OECD members have worked to reconcile divergent national regulatory approaches, applying a single framework across sovereign states, in effect determining whose knowledge-making practices would guide regulatory action throughout the industrialized world. Focusing on US regulators, industry associations, and environmental groups, this article explores the participatory politics of OECD chemical regulation harmonization in the late 1970s to early 1980s. These efforts were conditioned by differential institutional access and resources among stakeholders who sought to shape regulatory knowledge rules. Facing competing European and US approaches to chemical data-a minimum "base set" of test data versus case-by-case determinations-OECD members chose the European approach in 1980. However, US regulatory politics shifted with the election of President Reagan, prompting industry associations to lobby the US government to block the agreement. Examining the micropolitics of these standards in the making, I demonstrate that while long-term structures advantaged industrial actors, ideological alignment with the US government precipitated their decisive influence. The case illustrates the importance of attending to the distinctive politics of international harmonization and the effects on transnational knowledge-making and regulatory intervention
Citizen journalism · Economics · Harmonization · International trade · Liberalization · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regulatory state · Sovereignty · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · Historical and Scientific Studies · Historical Medical Research and Treatments · Law · Public Administration
The relational structure of corporate ignorance production
Knowledge Work as a Condition of Accumulation in the Pesticide Industry
The matter and the metrics
The Effect of Collective Decision-Making on Productivity
Embrasser la cause des cancers professionnels. Bifurcation d'un service de l'OMS et de son créateur
Science in action
The OECD and Transnational Governance
Scientists and the Regulation of Risk
The Hegemony of Growth
Seeds, Science, and Struggle
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Designs on Nature
Labor and the Environmental Movement
Standards
Building an Institutional Field to Corral a Government
Open for Business
Residues
Inventing Prediction for Regulation
Progress, Innovation and Regulatory Science in Drug Development
Non-stick science
Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance
Risk, Science and Politics
To Test or Not to Test
Science and Power in Global Food Regulation
Biotechnology and Empire
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2027 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |