Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

To Test or Not to Test

Tools, Rules, and Corporate Data in US Chemicals Regulation

Bibliographic Data

ID5337717
AuthorsAngela N H Creager (0000-0002-7763-6432, Princeton University, NJ, USA, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue5
Pages975-997
Publication date2021-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/01622439211013373
OpenAlexW3163276448
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited26

When the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was passed by the US Congress in 1976, its advocates pointed to new generation of genotoxicity tests as a way to systematically screen chemicals for carcinogenicity. However, in the end, TSCA did not require any new testing of commercial chemicals, including these rapid laboratory screens. In addition, although the Environmental Protection Agency was to make public data about the health effects of industrial chemicals, companies routinely used the agency's obligation to protect confidential business information to prevent such disclosures. This paper traces the contested history of TSCA and its provisions for testing, from the circulation of the first draft bill in the Nixon administration through the debates over its implementation, which stretched into the Reagan administration. The paucity of publicly available health and environmental data concerning chemicals, I argue, was a by-product of the law and its execution, leading to a situation of institutionalized ignorance, the underside of regulatory knowledge

Business · Compendium · Confidentiality · Ignorance · Obligation · Political science · Public disclosure · Engineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law

  • The relational structure of corporate ignorance production

    Open Access•Gabriel Lévesque•Social Networks•2027

  • The Collective Action of Firms on Regulatory Science

    Open Access•David Demortain•Journal of Agrarian Change•2026

  • Implicit Values in the Recent Carbon Nanotube Debate

    Open Access•Nicholas Surber, Rickard Arvidsson et al.•NanoEthics•2023

  • Tackling toxins

    Open Access•T Bartley, Malcolm Fairbrother•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Regrettable for whom? GenX chemicals as a case study in detrimental chemical substitution

    Open Access•Alissa Cordner, Anna Allgeyer et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Confronting legacy lead in soils in the United States

    Open Access•Dan Walls, Abby Kinchy et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Toxic Ignorance. How Regulatory Procedures and Industrial Knowledge Jeopardise the Risk Assessment of Chemicals

    Henri Boullier, Emmanuel Henry•Science as Culture•2022

  • Surfacing Law

    M X Mitchell•Environmental History•2026

  • Deregulatory Disclosure Regimes and Masked Absences in Fracking Chemical Data

    Open Access•Vivian Underhill, Gary Allison et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2025

  • Creating Regulatory Harmony

    Open Access•Colleen Lanier-Christensen•Science Technology & Human Values•2021

  • Embrasser la cause des cancers professionnels. Bifurcation d'un service de l'OMS et de son créateur

    Open Access•Valentin Thomas•Sociologie du Travail•2023

  • The Environmental State

    Open Access•Christopher M Rea, Scott Frickel•Sociological Theory•2023

  • Technoscience and Environmental Justice

    Gwen Ottinger, Benjamin R Cohen•Technoscience and environmental…•2011

  • Beauty, Health, and Permanence

    Open Access•Samuel P Hays•Beauty, Health, and Permanence•1987

  • Inventing Prediction for Regulation

    Open Access•Henri Boullier, David Demortain et al.•Science & Technology Studies•2019

  • Molecular Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Evan Hepler-Smith•Environmental History•2018

  • Non-stick science

    Open Access•Lauren Richter, Alissa Cordner et al.•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Pollution Control in the United States

    Open Access•Richard C Feiock, Richard Feiock et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1999

  • Undone Science

    Open Access•Scott Frickel, Sahra Gibbons et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

Unique citing works12
Citations per year2,4
Citation span2021 - 2027 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae