A Sustainable City Made By Resident-Experts - How Designerly Intervention Enacted Rights of the Public and Urban Infrastructure
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337416 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Koo (0000-0003-2858-7766, Sociology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1016-1045 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01622439241283060 |
| OpenAlex | W4402567954 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 36 |
This paper proposes an investigation of how enacting infrastructure is intertwined with historically specific processes of constructing the public, which necessitates a focus on the co-production of public problems and the public, and the establishment of infrastructural connections . Intervening in the context where reflexive planning and design methodologies are deployed to implement urban regeneration through public engagement (what I call "designerly intervention"), this paper investigates what type of collectivity is constituted as infrastructural publics by designerly interventions and what forms of rights they can have. Drawing on ethnographic accounts of urban regeneration in Seoul, it shows how designerly interventions mobilize residents as possessing a novel form of expertise, as "resident-experts" who can design a sustainable city, problematizing the renewal of the worn-out infrastructure as how to stimulate the resilience of a city. This results in an infrastructural connection that focuses on immediate results and the ordinary scale of urban regeneration, which enacts the rights of the public as city-users' rights, namely not as rights protected by law but as a practical capacity that infrastructural devices in everyday life provide. This paper explores how designerly interventions invoke an experimental approach that opens up the normative questions of public engagement with planning
Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Public Administration · Urban Planning and Governance · Water Governance and Infrastructure
Shaping technology/building society
Political Machines
Design Justice
Program Earth
Experiments in engagement
Reflecting on public engagement and science policy
The Science of Urbanization and the Open City
The Government of Things
The Quito Papers and the New Urban Agenda
Material Politics
Why should we promote public engagement with science
Sorting Things Out
Democracy's Infrastructure
Post-Soviet Social
Rule of Experts
Producing the Post-Fordist Public
Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion
Why political ontology must be experimentalized
Fluid technologies
The Issues Deserve More Credit
The Zimbabwe Bush Pump
Public Participation in Planning
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
The wrong bin bag
Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy
Studying Obduracy in the City
Configuring the User
Seeing Like a State
The 100th object
Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
For a Sociology of Expertise
A little street vending stall in the metropolis
The anti-political economy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |