Mass-Mediated Expertise as Informal Policy Advice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Imme Petersen (0000-0002-8828-8672, University of Hamburg, FSP BIOGUM, Hamburg, Germany, corresponding author), Harald Heinrichs (0000-0003-1529-4235, Leuphana University of Lueneburg, Institute for Sustainability Communication, Lueneburg, Germany), Hans P Peters (0000-0002-8777-4329, Forschungszentrum Jülich) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 865-887 |
| Publication date | 2010-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243909357914 |
| OpenAlex | W2069447869 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 31 |
Scientific policy advice is usually perceived as a formalized advisory process within political institutions. Politics has benefited from this arrangement because the science-based rationalization of policy has contributed to its legitimacy. However, in Western democratic societies, scientific expertise that is routinely mobilized to legitimate political positions has increasingly lost its power due to controversial expertise in the public sphere in particular within the mass media. As a consequence of the medialization of science, political decision makers are increasingly confronted with mass-mediated expertise. Empirical results of a qualitative survey among decision makers in the German political and administrative system, presented in this article, support the hypothesis that mass-mediated expertise has a significant impact on policy processes. Five functions of media coverage on science-based issues for policy making were identified. Mass-mediated expertise has therefore altered the established relations between scientific policy advisors and political decision makers and can be seen as informal policy advice complementing institutionalized advisory arrangements
Cognitive reframing · Democracy · German · Legitimacy · Mass media · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology
Everyday Uncertainty Work
Os cientistas e os meios de comunicação de massa
How perceptions of voter control affect politicians’ evaluations of expertise in the news
Building a Public Controversy
Aufbruch ins Unversicherbare
The political leaning of the neuroscience discourse about school education in the French press from 2000 to 2020
The politics of Covid-19 experts
Between Social Philosophy and Technical Execution
AI in the German Media
“You Can Do Better Than That!”
Sources and Framing of Fracking
Media and ‘undone science’ in West Virginia’s Elk River chemical spill
National Ethics Advisory Bodies in the Emerging Landscape of Responsible Research and Innovation
A Risky Object? How Microplastics Are Represented in the German Media
Preaching to the converted? An analysis of the UK public for space exploration
Networking expertise
Journalismus als Adressat von Hochschulkommunikation
The devil‐angel shift in times of crisis
Phosphorus geopolitical scarcity
The mediatization of the economist profession
Scientists in power plays
Blending Research, Journalism, and Community Expertise
Diagnostic Narratives
Re-Thinking Science
Controversy, politics of technical decisions
Wirtschaft und Soziales in der politischen Kommunikation
Professionalisierung der Politikvermittlung?
Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy
Mandated Science
Agenda-Setting
The crisis of scientific expertise in fin de siècle Europe
Selling science, how the press covers science and technology
Qualitative Sozialforschung
Mediengesellschaft und Medialisierung
Reciprocal Effects
Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public
Public Perceptions and Mass Media in the Biotechnology Controversy
Bias in risk-benefit analysis
Nuclear power, chemical hazards, and the quantity of reporting
The Anatomy of Agenda-Setting Research
Mediatization of Politics
Instrumental Actualization
Journalists, broadcasters, scientific experts and public opinion
The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking Targeting Toxic Waste
Culture and Technological Innovation
The Third-Person Effect in Communication
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,64 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2026 (15) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |