Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Post-Normal Science in Practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency

Bibliographic Data

ID5337625
AuthorsA C Petersen (0000-0003-0706-5635, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), The Hague, Netherlands,, corresponding author), Albert Cath (Narratio Knowledge & Advice, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Maria Hage (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), The Hague, Netherlands), Maria do Socorro Castro Hage (0000-0002-9494-2984, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency), Eva Kunseler (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), The Hague, Netherlands), J P van der Sluijs (0000-0002-1346-5953, Utrecht University)
Year2011
Volume36
Issue3
Pages362-388
Publication date2011-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243910385797
PMID23805014
PMCIDPMC3682633
OpenAlexW2168908284
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited31

About a decade ago, the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL) unwittingly embarked on a transition from a technocratic model of science advising to the paradigm of ''post-normal science'' (PNS). In response to a scandal around uncertainty management in 1999, a Guidance for ''Uncertainty Assessment and Communication'' was developed with advice from the initiators of the PNS concept and was introduced in 2003. This was followed in 2007 by a ''Stakeholder Participation'' Guidance. In this article, the authors provide a combined insider/outsider perspective on the transition process. The authors assess the extent to which the PNS paradigm has delivered new approaches in the agency's practice and analyze two projects-on long-term options for Dutch sustainable development policy and for urban development policy-the latter in somewhat more detail. The authors identify several paradoxes PBL encounters when putting the PNS concept into practice. It is concluded that an openness to other styles of work than the technocratic model has become visible, but that the introduction of the PNS paradigm is still in its early stage

Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change and Sustainable Development · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Engineering

  • Does the engagement between science and society pose risks for intelligent scientific practice

    Open Access•Hugo Lotriet•The Journal for Transdisciplinary…•2015

  • Designing visualization software for super-wicked problems

    Open Access•Kirsten M Winters, Judith Bayard Cushing et al.•Information Polity•2016

  • Uncertainty and Dissent in Climate Risk Assessment

    J P van der Sluijs•Nature and Culture•2012

  • Peer Review and Quality Control

    Open Access•Silvio Funtowicz, Silvio O Funtowicz et al.•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy

    Simo Sarkki, Jari Niemelä et al.•Science and Public Policy•2014

  • Co-producing “Post-normal” Climate Knowledge with Communities in Northeast Bangladesh

    Open Access•Sina Bremer, Mathew Stiller-Reeve et al.•Weather, Climate, and Society•2018

  • Knowledge, Expertise and Science Advice During Covid-19

    Open Access•Maru Mormina•Social Epistemology•2022

  • Mark B. Brown, Science in Democracy. Expertise, Institutions, and Representation

    Open Access•Ruth Hoppe, Robert Hoppe•Minerva•2011

  • Assessing qualitative and quantitative dimensions of uncertainty in energy modelling for policy support in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Steve Pye, Francis G N Li et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Communication approaches for carbon capture and storage

    Open Access•Katarina Buhr, Wibeck•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Beyond consensus

    Open Access•J P van der Sluijs, Rinie van Est et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2010

  • Risks and Realities of Speculative Ethics

    Open Access•Yana Suchikova•NanoEthics•2025

  • Lessons from post‐normal science for climate science‐sceptic debates

    Open Access•John Turnpenny•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2012

  • The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability

    Open Access•Andrea Saltelli, Luciano Benini et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Adding ‘iterativity’ to the credibility, relevance, legitimacy

    Open Access•Simo Sarkki, Rob Tinch et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Navigating the authority paradox

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Kunseler, W Tuinstra•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • The regional level as boundary organization? An analysis of climate change adaptation governance in Norway

    Open Access•Halvor Dannevig, Carlo Aall•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Problematizing post-normal science in the Global South

    Open Access•Francisco Orozco-Meléndez, Jaime Paneque-Gálvez et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Practising environmental policy evaluation under co-existing evaluation imaginaries

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Kunseler, Eleftheria Vasileiadou•Evaluation•2016

  • How to normalize reflexive evaluation? Navigating between legitimacy and integrity

    Open Access•Lisa Verwoerd, Pim Klaassen et al.•Evaluation•2020

  • The Sustainable City

    Open Access•Ton Dassen, Eva Kunseler et al.•Sustainable Development•2012

  • Climate Policy and Industry Elite Perceptions of Risk and Uncertainty

    Catherine Mei Ling Wong, Stewart Lockie•Society & Natural Resources•2020

  • Scientific policy advice on sustainable development

    Open Access•Nataliia Sokolovska, Anne Ellersiek et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2024

  • Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning

    Open Access•Gregory M Hill, Steven A Kolmes et al.•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2019

  • Incorporating uncertainty in national-level climate change-mitigation policy

    Open Access•Daniel Puig, Fatemeh Bakhtiari•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2018

  • Technology assessment and postnormal science

    Open Access•Tom Børsen•Futures•2024

  • Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues

    Open Access•Pita Spruijt, Anne Knol et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2014

  • A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment

    Open Access•Wanda Leung, Bram Noble et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2015

  • Analyzing stakeholder's perceptions of uncertainty to advance collaborative sustainability science

    Open Access•Robert Goodspeed, Anikka Van Eyl et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2018

  • The Role of Time in Post-Normal Knowledge Creation and Decision-Making in Public Administration

    Open Access•Samuel R Baty, Sharon Mastracci•Administration & Society•2023

  • Enhanced science–stakeholder communication to improve ecosystem model performances for climate change impact assessments

    Open Access•Anna Maria Jönsson, Olle Anderbrant et al.•AMBIO•2015

  • The reflective futures practitioner

    Open Access•Eva-Maria Kunseler, W Tuinstra et al.•Futures•2015

  • Linking deliberative evaluation with integrated assessment and modelling

    Open Access•Sandrine Allain, Gaël Plumecocq et al.•Futures•2020

  • The ethos of post-normal science

    Open Access•Nicolas Kønig, Tom Børsen et al.•Futures•2017

  • Commentary

    Open Access•Togo Tsukahara•Futures•2017

  • One Pipeline and Two Impact Assessments

    Open Access•I G Stewart, Moira E Harding•Science Technology & Human Values•2023

  • Scientific decision-making and stakeholder consultations

    Open Access•Lada Timotijevic, Julie Barnett et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Re-Thinking Science

    Helga Nowotny, Michael T Gibbons et al.•Re-Thinking Science•2013

  • Scientific knowledge and its social problems

    Jerome R Ravetz•Scientific knowledge and its…•1973

  • Perspectives on Global Change

    Open Access•Jan Rotmans, Bert De Vries•Perspectives on Global Change•1997

  • Cultural Boundaries of Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•Cultural Boundaries of Science•1998

  • Between Politics and Science

    Open Access•David H Guston•Between politics and science•2000

  • Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences

    Open Access•Naomi Oreskes, Kristin Shrader-Frechette et al.•Science•1994

  • Coping with intractable controversies

    Open Access•Matthijs Hisschemöller, Rob Hoppe•Knowledge, technology &…•1995

  • Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Uncertainty in Model‐Based Environmental Assessment

    Open Access•J P van der Sluijs, Matthieu Craye et al.•Risk Analysis•2005

  • Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk

    Open Access•M B A Van Asselt, Marjolein B A van Asselt et al.•Perspectives on Uncertainty and…•2000

  • Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions

    Open Access•J P van der Sluijs, A C Petersen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2008

  • The worth of a songbird

    Open Access•Silvio Funtowicz, Silvio O Funtowicz et al.•Ecological Economics•1994

  • Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments

    Open Access•Arjan Wardekker, J Arjan Wardekker et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2008

  • Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions

    Judith Petts•Journal of Risk Research•2004

  • Conceptualizing sustainable development

    Open Access•Bert J M de Vries, A C Petersen•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science

    Open Access•David H Guston•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • The Third Wave of Science Studies

    Open Access•H M Collins, Harry Collins et al.•Social Studies of Science•2002

  • Utopian and pragmatic rationalism

    Open Access•Yaron Ezrahi•Minerva•1980

  • A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment

    Open Access•J P van der Sluijs•Futures•2002

  • Stakeholder participation in environmental knowledge production

    Open Access•Maria Hage, Maria do Socorro Castro Hage et al.•Futures•2010

  • Past and future of backcasting

    Open Access•Jaco Quist, Philip J Vergragt et al.•Futures•2006

  • Participative backcasting

    Open Access•Annika Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika Carlsson‐Kanyama et al.•Futures•2008

  • Science for the post-normal age

    Open Access•Silvio Funtowicz, Silvio O Funtowicz et al.•Futures•1993

  • Hybrid Management

    Open Access•Cheryl Allyn Miller, Clark Miller•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

Unique citing works37
Citations per year2,31
Citation span2010 - 2025 (16)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 34

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae