Elites and arbitrary power
Ethical Challenges and Guiding Principles for Research With Violent Political Actors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5680838 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Niloufer Siddiqui (0000-0002-1816-5378, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs & Policy, University at Albany-State University, New York, New York, USA, corresponding author), Megan Turnbull (0000-0002-7621-0675, University of Georgia) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 599-619 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Conflict Security and Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1467-8802 • E-ISSN: 1478-1174 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14678802.2024.2382189 |
| OpenAlex | W4401185013 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 30 |
Many approaches to and recommendations for ethical research assume a power dynamic between the researcher and the researched that favours the researcher. When study participants include political elites however, the power dynamic is often reversed. This power differential in favour of political elites can render existing guidelines unhelpful or inappropriate, especially where such actors have individualised discretion over coercion and violence. We argue that paying particular attention to how political elites wield arbitrary power can help researchers navigate ethical challenges that arise when political elites are included in the study. We focus on three topics in particular: researchers' interactions with political elites outside of formal data collection, anticipating and reducing risks for non-elite study participants, and sharing and contextualising research findings with scholars and a general audience. In doing so, this paper contributes to a growing conversation on the thorny ethical challenges that come with studying violent political elites
Conversation · Discretion · Elite · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Voter Backlash and Elite Misperception
Research as More Than Extraction
Field Research in Political Science
Ethics of Research in Conflict Environments
Fieldwork Under FireContemporary Studies of Violence and Culture
Surviving Field Research
Interview Research in Political Science
Republicanism
Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict
Reforming Institutional Review Board Policy
When armed groups refuse to carry out election violence
Ethical Imperialism
Beyond non-domination
Elite Competition, Social Movements, and Election Violence in Nigeria
Incumbent Responses to Armed Groups in Nigeria and Kenya
Ethical Imperialism
Beyond the Field
The ‘Tribal Politics’ of Field Research
Kenya’s 2013 Elections
Political Parties and Violence in Karachi, Pakistan
No Easy Answers
Toward Active Reflexivity
Ethics Abroad
The Third Gender
From snapshots to panoramas
Ethics, empathy, and fear in research on violent conflict
The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones
The ethics of ethnographic methods in conflict zones
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |