Rethinking veteran return trips from a relational perspective
Partner's Role in Challenging Military Discourses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5681555 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Siri Driessen (0000-0002-6778-8977), Jeannette Van Brenk (Humanistic Military Chaplaincy), Nicole Immler |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 18-38 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Military Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2333-7486 • E-ISSN: 2333-7494 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23337486.2024.2336298 |
| OpenAlex | W4393352637 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 33 |
The voices of women with a military partner are often unheard in research on military deployments and their aftermath, even though partners are seen as key pillars of support to military veterans, both by military institutions and society. Research on the experiences of partners is usually done from a clinical or psychological perspective, studying (secondary) traumatization, moral injury, or/and the consequences of living with someone suffering from PTSD. However, how partners themselves assign meaning to military deployments is often overlooked. We engage with this paradox by empirically studying organized group return trips to Bosnia. Recent developments indicate that military organizations gain more interest in partners’ experiences–at least on paper. Since 2023, the Dutch government has granted hundreds of Dutchbat 3 veterans (those stationed in Srebrenica in 1995) and their partners the opportunity to return to Bosnia, as a gesture of recognition and care. We analyse the role of veterans’ partners in changing hegemonic narratives on return trips to Bosnia, and add a gendered perspective to this field of research. While military discourses on the return trip mainly focus on improving the wellbeing of veterans, our research shows that partners are pertinent to invoking repair of the suffering experienced. Recognition entails renewing social relationships. By applying a relational approach, we show the return trips’ potential to renew conversations between couples. However, we also demonstrate that attempts to counter hegemonic narratives often result in a confirmation instead of a transformation of earlier acquired perspectives
Perspective (graphical · Political science · Sociology · TRIPS architecture · Computer Science · Education and Military Integration · Engineering · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Military History and Strategy · Psychology
War Grave Pilgrimage
Return to Vietnam
Holding and Letting Go
Journeys of Redemption and Reconciliation
Counter the Counterstory
Emancipatory voice and the recursivity of authentic silence
Lest we forget’
Forces for Good? Narratives of Military Masculinity in Peacekeeping Operations
Encounters with the Military
Women as agents of ethnic reconciliation? women's ngos and international intervention in postwar bosnia–herzegovina
Being There Together
The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions
Relational Being
Remaining 'in-between' the divides? Conceptual, methodological, and ethical political dilemmas of engaged research in Critical Military Studies
Unmaking militarized masculinity
The Irish defence forces and the silencing of a feminist researcher
Deeply odd
Battlefield Pilgrims at Gettysburg National Military Park
Shaping hope in everyday life
Making Sense of War Memories
The Privatized Meaning of Wartime Deployments
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |