Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Varieties of Religious Repression

Why Governments Restrict Religion

Bibliographic Data

ID5707693
AuthorsRollin F Tusalem (0000-0003-2029-941X, Arkansas State University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume58
Issue2
Pages374-377
Publication date2016-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Church and State (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-969X • E-ISSN: 2040-4867
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jcs/csw020
OpenAlexW2321068207
LanguageEN

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War ushered in the importance of religious cleavages in several societies in the developing world. As religion replaced ideological divisions in facilitating interstate conflict and political instability, governments increasingly repressed religious movements. There is a paucity of contemporary empirical work that examines why and how states repress the mobilization, activism, and proselytization efforts of religious groups. Sarkissian's work fills in this gap by examining why and how states initiate religious repression from a large sample of illiberal democracies. The major contribution of this important work is her argument that there is no unifying theory explaining how states repress religious groups. Yet, Sarkissian offers a parsimonious and elegant theory regarding how there is a large variation as regards to the repressive tendencies of nondemocratic states. The theory suggests that the level of religious repression is contingent upon two interacting dimensions—the level of political competition and the degree of religious divisions within the state. For example, nondemocratic states with very low levels of political competition but with high levels of religious divisions are more likely to have repressive laws that restrict religious-based activities. Conversely, illiberal polities with high levels of political competition but with low levels of religious pluralism in society are likely to have states that do not actively repress religious groups. Lastly, states that have modest levels of political competition and religious pluralism are likely to exhibit repressive tendencies only for certain religious groups that the state deems to be destabilizing. Sarkissian strengthens her theoretical claims using numerous datasets on religion, more specifically those collated from the Religion and State Dataset (RAS) and the International Religious Freedom Act (IRF).

Competition (biology) · Ideology · Pluralism (philosophy) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Religious organization · Religious pluralism · Sociology · State (computer science) · Law · Religion and Society Interactions

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae