Open or Closed? An Assessment of How Blogs Can Contribute to Policy-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID5716181
AuthorsVicki Bamford, Vicki A Bamford (0000-0003-1806-913X, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume151
Issue1
Pages16-24
Publication date2014-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedia International Australia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1329-878X • E-ISSN: 2200-467X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1329878x1415100104
OpenAlexW2229199876
LanguageEN
References cited17

This article analyses the processes and outcomes of communication by two Australian government departments - the Departments of Broadband, Communication and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR - that used blogs to consult with citizens on a policy that was under development. The researcher also interviewed managers of the blog processes of both departments to secure their feedback. The findings indicate that closed community blogs create excellent conditions for rich policy input, while open blogs (available to all citizens) provide less specific and less useable policy input. This is partially because public blogs are easily skewed off topic by participants who wish to dictate a particular view or as a result of 'the vibe' in the public sphere, affected by media and other people's commentary that can set the agenda for discussion. Nevertheless, open blogs can provide government with a litmus test of the immediate concerns of active members of the public

Business · Litmus · Open data · Open government · Political science · Public policy · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Law · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access