Pathways to practice

Praxiography and International Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID5771184
AuthorsChristian Bueger (0000-0002-4259-9299, Cardiff University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume6
Issue3
Pages383-406
Publication date2013-10-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-7739 • E-ISSN: 1755-7747
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1755773913000167
OpenAlexW1972335866
LanguageEN
Citations received115
References cited67

Political scientists have started to focus on 'practice' as the smallest unit of analysis. Following a broader turn in the social sciences, the practice focus provides multiple advantages, including better conceptualizations of short-term social change, getting closer to the everyday activities of those speaking, writing and doing politics, appropriate conceptualization of agency-structure dynamics, or forms of analysis resonating with other communities than scholarly ones. This contribution asks what the methodological implications of the practice turn are. It is argued that the practice focus does not only imply a certain 'theory' but also a certain methodology. I advance the term praxiography to speak about the forms of analysis produced by practice researchers. I discuss key guidelines of praxiographic research on two levels: first, general research strategies that provide empirical access points, second, guidelines for data collection in the frame of participant observation, expert interviews, and document analysis. I conclude in arguing that although praxiography is context driven, and hence requires to be tailored to the research problem, it is vital to reflect on the methodological repertoire of praxiographic research

Social practice · Structure and agency · Philippine History and Culture · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access