Getting out of hot water

Facework in social predicaments

Bibliographic Data

ID5774052
AuthorsHolley S Hodgins (Skidmore College, corresponding author), Elizabeth Liebeskind, Warren F Schwartz, Warren Schwartz
Year1996
Volume71
Issue2
Pages300-314
Publication date1996-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.300
OpenAlexW4236604657
LanguageEN
Citations received41
References cited25

Participants wrote accounts to victims of social predicaments. Results showed that autonomous perpetrators offered more mitigation, used more complexity in accounts, and used fewer lies, especially to acquaintances. High blame was associated with less mitigating and complex accounts and greater deception; this occurred despite perpetrators' understanding of probable relationship harm. Women were more concerned with repairing others' face damage, at least in part to preserve relationships; their self-esteem also was more harmed by lack of forgiveness, especially from friends. Perpetrators gave longer, more mitigating and complex accounts to friends and more mitigating accounts to high-status victims. Participants who used aggravating elements expected more positive relationships. Results are discussed in terms of competing demands for facework. Human social interaction has been characterized as an elaborate ritual governed by a shared system of politeness that implicitly recognizes the social identities or of participants (Brown & Levinson, 1987; Goffman, 1955, 1959; Scott & Lyman, 1968). When one party fails to observe conventions, the faces of all participants are threatened, interaction is disrupted, tension ensues, and participants feel lowered esteem (Goffman, 1955, 1959; Schonbach, 1990). For equilibrium to be restored, face damage must be repaired through corrective facework (see Cupach & Metts, 1994). If facework is not performed adequately, relationships are damaged or may terminate. Perpetrators play a crucial role in the restoration of equilibrium after face-threatening events through the provision of accounts that repair the victim's face damage. However, predicaments also threaten perpetrators' own faces; hence, accounts simultaneously must address damage to one's own and the victim's faces. Of course, needs for own and other facework often compete; if equilibrium is to be restored, accounts must achieve a delicate balance that satisfies both face needs

Face (sociological concept · Face negotiation theory · Social approval · Social science · Sociology · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub